Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
High-Grade Cervical Dysplasia following Radiation Therapy for Invasive Cervical Cancer: A Report of Four Cases.
Salcedo, Mila Pontremoli; Milbourne, Andrea M; Jhingran, Anuja; Eifel, Patricia J; Ramirez, Pedro T; Schmeler, Kathleen M.
Afiliação
  • Salcedo MP; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Federal University of Health Sciences/Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Brazil.
  • Milbourne AM; Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex., USA.
  • Jhingran A; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex., USA.
  • Eifel PJ; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex., USA.
  • Ramirez PT; Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex., USA.
  • Schmeler KM; Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex., USA.
Case Rep Oncol ; 8(2): 217-21, 2015.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26078740
INTRODUCTION: The standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer is chemoradiation, with the majority of patients having a complete response to the therapy. The current surveillance recommendations from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology include annual cytology, with a small proportion of patients subsequently diagnosed with high-grade cervical dysplasia (CIN 2/3). To date, there is limited information regarding the optimal treatment and outcome for patients diagnosed with CIN 2/3. The current report describes the diagnosis, management and outcome of 4 patients diagnosed with CIN 2/3 following chemoradiation. CASE DESCRIPTION: We describe 4 patients who developed CIN 2/3 seven months to 8 years following radiation therapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. All 4 patients were asymptomatic and the abnormalities were first detected by a Pap test. Three of the patients were managed conservatively with observation, and the CIN 2/3 resolved without intervention. One patient underwent 2 cervical conizations followed by a hysterectomy with no residual dysplasia noted on the hysterectomy specimen. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with recurrent cervical cancer after chemoradiation are symptomatic, and most cases are detected by a physical examination. The role of cytology, colposcopy and biopsies may be of limited value. Furthermore, the significance of the diagnosis of CIN 2/3 in patients previously treated with radiation therapy was not associated with recurrent disease in the 4 patients described. Our results suggest that cytology may be of limited value in detecting recurrence in patients following radiation therapy, even when CIN 2/3 is detected.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Prevencao_e_fatores_de_risco / Agentes_cancerigenos / Tipos_de_cancer / Outros_tipos Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Case Rep Oncol Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Prevencao_e_fatores_de_risco / Agentes_cancerigenos / Tipos_de_cancer / Outros_tipos Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Case Rep Oncol Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil