Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical and Imaging Follow-up Practices after Transarterial Therapy for Primary and Secondary Hepatic Malignancies: Results of an Online Survey.
Gaba, Ron C; Baerlocher, Mark O; Nikolic, Boris; Venkatesan, Aradhana M; Lewandowski, Robert J.
Afiliação
  • Gaba RC; Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System, 1740 West Taylor St, MC 931, Chicago, IL 60612. Electronic address: rgaba@uic.edu.
  • Baerlocher MO; Department of Radiology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Barrie, Ontario, Canada.
  • Nikolic B; Department of Radiology, Stratton Medical Center, Albany, New York.
  • Venkatesan AM; Department of Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Lewandowski RJ; Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois.
Acad Radiol ; 22(12): 1510-5, 2015 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26432072
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To characterize practices and quantify variation in longitudinal follow-up approaches among interventional radiologists (IRs) after liver transarterial locoregional therapy (LRT) in contemporary Interventional Oncology practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In November/December 2014, Society of Interventional Radiology members were invited to participate in a survey regarding clinical and imaging follow-up of liver cancer patients treated with transarterial LRT. On survey closure, responses were compiled and analyzed. RESULTS: The 30-item survey response rate was 11% (361 of 3290). Respondents were predominantly American IRs (311 of 355, 88%) who perform 1-5 LRTs monthly (196 of 354, 55%). Most (305 of 336, 91%) IRs reported longitudinal follow-up, with patient encounters within 1-month (73%, 211 of 290) postprocedure and every 3 months (68%, 196 of 287) thereafter and involvement in imaging (up to 80%, 235 of 290) ordering and evaluation. Preferred timing of first follow-up imaging (1 month vs. 3 months) and response criteria used (mRECIST favored) varied. CONCLUSIONS: Although IRs are actively involved in clinical and imaging follow-up of patients with liver malignancies treated with transarterial LRTs, there are differences in imaging frequency and response assessment. These data may serve as a starting point for standardization of LRT follow-up.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Outros_tipos Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Padrões de Prática Médica / Radiografia Intervencionista / Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Acad Radiol Assunto da revista: RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Outros_tipos Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Padrões de Prática Médica / Radiografia Intervencionista / Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Acad Radiol Assunto da revista: RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article