Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effective cataract surgical coverage: An indicator for measuring quality-of-care in the context of Universal Health Coverage.
Ramke, Jacqueline; Gilbert, Clare E; Lee, Arier C; Ackland, Peter; Limburg, Hans; Foster, Allen.
Afiliação
  • Ramke J; School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Gilbert CE; School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Lee AC; Department Clinical Research, Faculty Infectious & Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
  • Ackland P; School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Limburg H; International Agency for the Prevention of Blindness, London, United Kingdom.
  • Foster A; Health Information Services, Nijenburg 32, Grootebroek, Netherlands.
PLoS One ; 12(3): e0172342, 2017.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28249047
OBJECTIVE: To define and demonstrate effective cataract surgical coverage (eCSC), a candidate UHC indicator that combines a coverage measure (cataract surgical coverage, CSC) with quality (post-operative visual outcome). METHODS: All Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness (RAAB) surveys with datasets on the online RAAB Repository on April 1 2016 were downloaded. The most recent study from each country was included. By country, cataract surgical outcome (CSOGood, 6/18 or better; CSOPoor, worse than 6/60), CSC (operated cataract as a proportion of operable plus operated cataract) and eCSC (operated cataract and a good outcome as a proportion of operable plus operated cataract) were calculated. The association between CSC and CSO was assessed by linear regression. Gender inequality in CSC and eCSC was calculated. FINDINGS: Datasets from 20 countries were included (2005-2013; 67,337 participants; 5,474 cataract surgeries). Median CSC was 53.7% (inter-quartile range[IQR] 46.1-66.6%), CSOGood was 58.9% (IQR 53.7-67.6%) and CSOPoor was 17.7% (IQR 11.3-21.1%). Coverage and quality of cataract surgery were moderately associated-every 1% CSC increase was associated with a 0.46% CSOGood increase and 0.28% CSOPoor decrease. Median eCSC was 36.7% (IQR 30.2-50.6%), approximately one-third lower than the median CSC. Women tended to fare worse than men, and gender inequality was slightly higher for eCSC (4.6% IQR 0.5-7.1%) than for CSC (median 2.3% IQR -1.5-11.6%). CONCLUSION: eCSC allows monitoring of quality in conjunction with coverage of cataract surgery. In the surveys analysed, on average 36.7% of people who could benefit from cataract surgery had undergone surgery and obtained a good visual outcome.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde / Catarata / Extração de Catarata / Bases de Dados Factuais / Cobertura do Seguro / Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde / Catarata / Extração de Catarata / Bases de Dados Factuais / Cobertura do Seguro / Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália