Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Lymphoma development and survival in refractory coeliac disease type II: Histological response as prognostic factor.
Nijeboer, P; van Wanrooij, Rlj; van Gils, T; Wierdsma, N J; Tack, G J; Witte, B I; Bontkes, H J; Visser, O; Mulder, Cjj; Bouma, G.
Afiliação
  • Nijeboer P; Department of Gastroenterology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Wanrooij R; Department of Gastroenterology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Gils T; Department of Gastroenterology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Wierdsma NJ; Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Tack GJ; Department of Gastroenterology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Witte BI; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Bontkes HJ; Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Visser O; Department of Haematology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Mulder C; Department of Gastroenterology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Bouma G; Department of Gastroenterology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
United European Gastroenterol J ; 5(2): 208-217, 2017 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28344788
BACKGROUND: Refractory coeliac disease type II (RCDII) frequently transforms into an enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (EATL) and therefore requires intensive treatment. Current evaluated treatment strategies for RCDII include cladribine (2-CdA) and autologous stem cell transplantation (auSCT). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term survival and define clear prognostic criteria for EATL development comparing two treatment strategies. METHODS: A total of 45 patients were retrospectively analysed. All patients received 2-CdA, after which they were either closely monitored (monotherapy, n = 30) or a step-up approach was used including auSCT (step-up therapy, n = 15). RESULTS: Ten patients (22%) ultimately developed EATL; nine of these had received monotherapy. Absence of histological remission after monotherapy was associated with EATL development (p = 0.010). Overall, 20 patients (44%) died with a median survival of 84 months. Overall survival (OS) within the monotherapy group was significantly worse in those without histological remission compared to those with complete histological remission(p = 0.030). The monotherapy group who achieved complete histological remission showed comparable EATL occurrence and OS as compared to the step-up therapy group (p = 0.80 and p = 0.14 respectively). CONCLUSION: Histological response is an accurate parameter to evaluate the effect of 2-CdA therapy and this parameter should be leading in the decisions whether or not to perform a step-up treatment approach in RCDII.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: United European Gastroenterol J Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: United European Gastroenterol J Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda