Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Results of viscobubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty after failure of pneumatic dissection.
Scorcia, Vincenzo; De Luca, Valentina; Lucisano, Andrea; Carnevali, Adriano; Carnovale Scalzo, Giovanna; Bovone, Cristina; Busin, Massimo.
Afiliação
  • Scorcia V; Department of Ophthalmology, University of "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy.
  • De Luca V; IRFO (Istituto internazionale di Ricerca e Formazione in Oftalmologia), Forli, Italy.
  • Lucisano A; Department of Ophthalmology, University of "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy.
  • Carnevali A; Department of Ophthalmology, University of "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy.
  • Carnovale Scalzo G; Department of Ophthalmology, University of "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy.
  • Bovone C; Department of Ophthalmology, University of "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy.
  • Busin M; IRFO (Istituto internazionale di Ricerca e Formazione in Oftalmologia), Forli, Italy.
Br J Ophthalmol ; 102(9): 1288-1292, 2018 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29275378
AIM: To report the outcomes of bubble formation obtained by means of intrastromal injection of ophthalmic viscoelastic device (OVD) after failure of pneumatic dissection for deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK). METHODS: DALK was performed in 140 keratoconic eyes of 130 patients by injecting air and OVD only secondarily, after pneumatic dissection had failed; the bubble formation rates after air and OVD injection were recorded; complications, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) and corneal tomographic parameters were evaluated 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively, as well as after complete suture removal. RESULTS: Air injection created a big bubble in 106/140 eyes (75.71%); OVD injection was not attempted in 4 eyes (perforation during cannula insertion n=2; air bubble burst n=2) and created a big bubble in 28 of the remaining 30 eyes (93.33%, 20% of the total). Manual dissection was required in 2/30 eyes (6.66%, 1.42% of the total) after failed OVD-assisted dissection.Deep folds, interface opacity and reduced BSCVA were noted in both eyes after failed OVD-assisted dissection. BSCVA was statistically better after pneumatic-assisted than after OVD-assisted dissection (P 0.01) only up to 3 months postoperatively; no statistically significant differences were recorded between the two techniques at later examinations. CONCLUSION: Intrastromal injection of OVD after failed pneumatic dissection increases considerably the success rate of bubble formation (from 75.71% to 95.71% in our series); however, when bubble formation fails, infiltration of OVD into the residual stroma makes manual dissection particularly challenging and causes severe interface haze resulting in poor visual outcomes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Acuidade Visual / Transplante de Córnea / Substância Própria / Dissecação / Ceratocone Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Br J Ophthalmol Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Acuidade Visual / Transplante de Córnea / Substância Própria / Dissecação / Ceratocone Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Br J Ophthalmol Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália