Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Conductivity Rise During Irreversible Electroporation: True Permeabilization or Heat?
Ruarus, Alette H; Vroomen, Laurien G P H; Puijk, Robbert S; Scheffer, Hester J; Faes, Theo J C; Meijerink, Martijn R.
Afiliação
  • Ruarus AH; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.ruarus@vumc.nl.
  • Vroomen LGPH; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Puijk RS; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Scheffer HJ; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Faes TJC; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Meijerink MR; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 41(8): 1257-1266, 2018 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29687261
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Irreversible electroporation (IRE) induces apoptosis with high-voltage electric pulses. Although the working mechanism is non-thermal, development of secondary Joule heating occurs. This study investigated whether the observed conductivity rise during IRE is caused by increased cellular permeabilization or heat development.

METHODS:

IRE was performed in a gelatin tissue phantom, in potato tubers, and in 30 patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Continuous versus sequential pulsing protocols (10-90 vs. 10-30-30-30) were assessed. Temperature was measured using fiber-optic probes. After temperature had returned to baseline, 100 additional pulses were delivered. The primary technique efficacy of the treated CRLM was compared to the periprocedural current rise. Seven patients received ten additional pulses after a 10-min cool-down period.

RESULTS:

Temperature and current rise was higher for the continuous pulsing protocol (medians, gel 13.05 vs. 9.55 °C and 9 amperes (A) vs. 7A; potato 12.70 vs. 10.53 °C and 6.0A vs. 6.5A). After cooling-down, current returned to baseline in the gel phantom and near baseline values (Δ2A with continuous- and Δ5A with sequential pulsing) in the potato tubers. The current declined after cooling-down in all seven patients with CRLM, although baseline values were not reached. There was a positive correlation between current rise and primary technique efficacy (p = 0.02); however, the previously reported current increase threshold of 12-15A was reached in 13%.

CONCLUSION:

The observed conductivity rise during IRE is caused by both cellular permeabilization and heat development. Although a correlation between current rise and efficacy exists, the current increase threshold seems unfeasible for CRLM.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Outros_tipos Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Eletroporação / Temperatura Alta / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Outros_tipos Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Eletroporação / Temperatura Alta / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda