Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Progression-free survival with endocrine-based therapies following progression on non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor among postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative metastatic breast cancer: a network meta-analysis.
Ayyagari, Rajeev; Tang, Derek; Patterson-Lomba, Oscar; Zhou, Zhou; Xie, Jipan; Chandiwana, David; Dalal, Anand A; Niravath, Polly Ann.
Afiliação
  • Ayyagari R; a Analysis Group Inc. , Boston , MA , USA.
  • Tang D; b Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation , East Hanover , NJ , USA.
  • Patterson-Lomba O; a Analysis Group Inc. , Boston , MA , USA.
  • Zhou Z; a Analysis Group Inc. , Boston , MA , USA.
  • Xie J; a Analysis Group Inc. , Boston , MA , USA.
  • Chandiwana D; b Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation , East Hanover , NJ , USA.
  • Dalal AA; b Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation , East Hanover , NJ , USA.
  • Niravath PA; c Methodist Hospital , Houston , TX , USA.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 34(9): 1645-1652, 2018 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29781326
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the comparative efficacy of currently available endocrine-based therapies (ETs) for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) after non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) progression. DESIGN: Network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS: Randomized clinical trials of ETs for HR+/HER2- mBC were identified via a systematic literature review using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and key conference proceedings. All trials met the following inclusion criteria: (1) included women with HR+/HER2- mBC; (2) previous treatment with ETs or chemotherapy as first-line therapy; (3) treatment with ET as monotherapy or in combination with targeted therapy; (4) progression-free survival (PFS) was reported; and (5) published in 2007 (when HER2 testing became standardized) or later. Regimens were compared using pairwise hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs) of PFS obtained from a Bayesian NMA. Treatments with different approved dosages were pooled into the same arm; anastrozole and exemestane were pooled as aromatase inhibitors (AIs) due to clinical similarities. RESULTS: A total of 4 trials and 6 regimens (palbociclib + fulvestrant, everolimus + fulvestrant, everolimus + AI, fulvestrant + AI, fulvestrant and AI) were eligible for inclusion. Palbociclib + fulvestrant and everolimus + AI had 50% and 55% reduced hazard of progression or death vs. AI (95% CrI upper bound ≤1), respectively. Palbociclib + fulvestrant, everolimus + AI and everolimus + fulvestrant had 54%, 58% and 40% reduced hazard vs. fulvestrant (95% CrI upper bound ≤1), while palbociclib + fulvestrant and everolimus + AI had 52% and 55% reduced hazard vs. fulvestrant + AI (95% CrI upper bound ≤1), respectively. CONCLUSION: Postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2- mBC who had previously failed an NSAI and received palbociclib + fulvestrant, everolimus + AI or everolimus + fulvestrant had longer PFS compared to those who received fulvestrant or AI alone.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Outros_tipos Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Antineoplásicos Hormonais / Inibidores da Aromatase Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Curr Med Res Opin Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Outros_tipos Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Antineoplásicos Hormonais / Inibidores da Aromatase Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Curr Med Res Opin Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos