Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of the IBIS breast cancer risk evaluator for women with lobular carcinoma in-situ.
Lo, Louisa Lisa; Milne, Roger Laughlin; Liao, Yuyan; Cuzick, Jack; Terry, Mary Beth; Phillips, Kelly-Anne.
Afiliação
  • Lo LL; Division of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Milne RL; Cancer Epidemiology and Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Liao Y; Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Cuzick J; Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
  • Terry MB; Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Phillips KA; Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Br J Cancer ; 119(1): 36-39, 2018 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29925933
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Management advice for women with lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is hampered by the lack of accurate personalised risk estimates for subsequent invasive breast cancer (BC). Prospective validation of the only tool that estimates individual BC risk for a woman with LCIS, the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study Risk Evaluation Tool (IBIS-RET), is lacking.

METHODS:

Using population-based cancer registry data for 732 women with LCIS, the calibration and discrimination accuracy of IBIS-RET Version 7.2 were assessed.

RESULTS:

The mean observed 10-year risk of invasive BC was 14.1% (95% CI11.3%-17.5%). IBIS-RET overestimated invasive BC risk (p = 0.0003) and demonstrated poor discriminatory accuracy (AUC 0.54, 95% CI 0.48 - 0.62).

CONCLUSIONS:

Clinicians should understand that IBIS-RET Version 7.2 may overestimate 10-year invasive BC risk for Australian women with LCIS. The newer IBIS-RET Version 8.0, released September 2017, includes mammographic density and may perform better, but validation is needed.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Epidemiologia / Geral / Saude_da_mulher / Mama / Tipos_de_cancer / Mama / Outros_tipos Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Carcinoma de Mama in situ / Invasividade Neoplásica Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Br J Cancer Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Epidemiologia / Geral / Saude_da_mulher / Mama / Tipos_de_cancer / Mama / Outros_tipos Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Carcinoma de Mama in situ / Invasividade Neoplásica Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Br J Cancer Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália