Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Troponin T release comparing manually or magnetically guided radiofrequency ablation for AVNRT- a MAGMA AVNRT substudy.
Kringeland, Ester Anne; Deisenhofer, Isabel; Hessling, Gabriele; Schuster, Peter.
Afiliação
  • Kringeland EA; a Department of Cardiology , Haukeland University Hospital , Bergen , Norway.
  • Deisenhofer I; b German Heart Center of Munich , Munich , Germany.
  • Hessling G; b German Heart Center of Munich , Munich , Germany.
  • Schuster P; a Department of Cardiology , Haukeland University Hospital , Bergen , Norway.
Scand Cardiovasc J ; 52(6): 362-366, 2018 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30570356
OBJECTIVES: Catheter ablation is regarded as first-line therapy for symptomatic atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT). Ablation induces intended myocardial damage and the extent of myocardial damage may differ between ablation methods. The objective of this MAGMA AVNRT(NCT00875914) substudy was to compare high-sensitive cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) levels as a surrogate marker for myocardial damage after manually guided (MAN) AVNRT ablation versus AVNRT ablation using remote magnetic navigation (RMN). DESIGN: In total, 70 patients (mean age 44 ± 14 years, 26% male) undergoing catheter ablation for AVNRT in the MagMa-AVNRT-Trial were randomized to remote magnetic navigation (n = 34, 49%) or manually guided catheter ablation (n = 36, 51%). hs-cTnT was measured the day after the procedure. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 6.2 ± 1.1 years. Acute success was 100% in both groups. hs-cTnT release was significantly lower in the remote magnetic navigation group (52 ng/L versus 95 ng/L, p < .01), even though the ablation time was longer and number of applications was higher with remote magnetic navigation (4.2 min vs 2.8 min, p = .017; 4.9 vs 3.3 applications, p = .01). hs-cTnT released per minute ablation time was also lower with remote magnetic navigation (12 ng/L versus 34 ng/L, p < .01). Both groups exhibited similar clinical long-term follow up regarding recurrence and complications. CONCLUSION: Remote magnetic navigation controlled catheter ablation of AVNRT has similar clinical outcome, but leads to less hs-cTnT release than manually guided catheter ablation. This might correspond to less unintended myocardial damage with RMN, which might be advantageous in complex ablation procedures.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Taquicardia por Reentrada no Nó Atrioventricular / Troponina T / Cirurgia Assistida por Computador / Tecnologia de Sensoriamento Remoto / Ablação por Radiofrequência / Cardiopatias / Magnetismo Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Scand Cardiovasc J Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Noruega

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Taquicardia por Reentrada no Nó Atrioventricular / Troponina T / Cirurgia Assistida por Computador / Tecnologia de Sensoriamento Remoto / Ablação por Radiofrequência / Cardiopatias / Magnetismo Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Scand Cardiovasc J Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Noruega