Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Updated Alternative Fistula Risk Score (ua-FRS) to Include Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy: Pan-European Validation.
Mungroop, Timothy H; Klompmaker, Sjors; Wellner, Ulrich F; Steyerberg, Ewout W; Coratti, Andrea; D'Hondt, Mathieu; de Pastena, Matteo; Dokmak, Safi; Khatkov, Igor; Saint-Marc, Olivier; Wittel, Uwe; Abu Hilal, Mohammed; Fuks, David; Poves, Ignasi; Keck, Tobias; Boggi, Ugo; Besselink, Marc G.
Afiliação
  • Mungroop TH; Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Klompmaker S; Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Wellner UF; Clinic of Surgery, UKSH Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
  • Steyerberg EW; Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie (DGAV) Studien-, Dokumentations- und Qualitätszentrum (StuDoQ|Pancreas), Germany.
  • Coratti A; Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • D'Hondt M; Department of Oncology and Robotic Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
  • de Pastena M; Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium.
  • Dokmak S; Department of Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy.
  • Khatkov I; Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France.
  • Saint-Marc O; Department of Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia.
  • Wittel U; Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Régional Orleans, Orleans, France.
  • Abu Hilal M; Department of Visceral and General Surgery, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.
  • Fuks D; Department of Surgery, Southampton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.
  • Poves I; Department of Digestive, Oncological and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
  • Keck T; Department of Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Boggi U; Clinic of Surgery, UKSH Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
  • Besselink MG; Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie (DGAV) Studien-, Dokumentations- und Qualitätszentrum (StuDoQ|Pancreas), Germany.
Ann Surg ; 273(2): 334-340, 2021 02 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30829699
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of the study was to validate and optimize the alternative Fistula Risk Score (a-FRS) for patients undergoing minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) in a large pan-European cohort.

BACKGROUND:

MIPD may be associated with an increased risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). The a-FRS could allow for risk-adjusted comparisons in research and improve preventive strategies for high-risk patients. The a-FRS, however, has not yet been validated specifically for laparoscopic, robot-assisted, and hybrid MIPD.

METHODS:

A validation study was performed in a pan-European cohort of 952 consecutive patients undergoing MIPD (543 laparoscopic, 258 robot-assisted, 151 hybrid) in 26 centers from 7 countries between 2007 and 2017. The primary outcome was POPF (International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery grade B/C). Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC; discrimination) and calibration plots. Validation included univariable screening for clinical variables that could improve performance.

RESULTS:

Overall, 202 of 952 patients (21%) developed POPF after MIPD. Before adjustment, the original a-FRS performed moderately (AUC 0.68) and calibration was inadequate with systematic underestimation of the POPF risk. Single-row pancreatojejunostomy (odds ratio 4.6, 95 confidence interval [CI] 2.8-7.6) and male sex (odds ratio 1.9, 95 CI 1.4-2.7) were identified as important risk factors for POPF in MIPD. The updated a-FRS, consisting of body mass index, pancreatic texture, duct size, and male sex, showed good discrimination (AUC 0.75, 95 CI 0.71-0.79) and adequate calibration. Performance was adequate for laparoscopic, robot-assisted, and hybrid MIPD and open pancreatoduodenectomy.

CONCLUSIONS:

The updated a-FRS (www.pancreascalculator.com) now includes male sex as a risk factor and is validated for both MIPD and open pancreatoduodenectomy. The increased risk of POPF in laparoscopic MIPD was associated with single-row pancreatojejunostomy, which should therefore be discouraged.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pancreatopatias / Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Fístula Pancreática / Pancreaticoduodenectomia / Laparoscopia / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pancreatopatias / Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Fístula Pancreática / Pancreaticoduodenectomia / Laparoscopia / Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda