Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is it safe to continue antithrombotic agents before prostate biopsy?
Tanabe, Kuniaki; Hattori, Tomotaka; Kobayashi, Hirohito; Koike, Kyoko; Maki, Yasuhiro; Arai, Takashi; Otsuka, Toshiaki; Suzuki, Yasutomo; Kondo, Yukihiro; Kawamura, Naoki.
Afiliação
  • Tanabe K; Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Hattori T; Department of Urology, Ebina General Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
  • Kobayashi H; Department of Urology, Ebina General Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
  • Koike K; Department of Urology, Ebina General Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
  • Maki Y; Department of Urology, Ebina General Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
  • Arai T; Department of Urology Kitakyushu General Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
  • Otsuka T; Department of Hygiene and Public Health, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Suzuki Y; Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusou Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
  • Kondo Y; Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Kawamura N; Department of Urology, Ebina General Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Prostate Int ; 7(2): 78-81, 2019 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31384610
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Whether antithrombotic agents should be stopped before prostate biopsy is unsettled. We investigated the impact of antithrombotic agents on bleeding complications after prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Among the patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy from June 2006 to December 2013 at Ebina General Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan, 1817 cases were retrospectively assessed. Patients were divided into two groups those not taking antithrombotic agents (control group) and those taking them (experimental group). The frequency and severity of bleeding complications after the procedure were compared. The severity of bleeding events was graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Advanced Events vol. 4.0.

RESULTS:

Hemorrhagic complications were classified into grades 1 to 3. Patients with complications of Grade 2 and above needed treatment. As for the Grade 1 event, there were no differences between two groups. The frequency of more than Grade 2 bleeding events was 1.7% and 3.5% in the control and experimental group, respectively; the odds ratio was 2.18 (P = 0.039). Grade 3 events occurred in seven patients of the control group (0.5%) and four patients of the experimental group (1.2%).

CONCLUSIONS:

The present study showed that continuation of antithrombotic agents increased the frequency of hemorrhagic complications requiring intervention. It suggests that attention should be paid to the patients taking antithrombotic agents before prostate biopsy.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies Idioma: En Revista: Prostate Int Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies Idioma: En Revista: Prostate Int Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão