Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Use, Perceived Usability, and Barriers to Implementation of a Patient Safety Dashboard Integrated within a Vendor EHR.
Bersani, Kerrin; Fuller, Theresa E; Garabedian, Pamela; Espares, Jenzel; Mlaver, Eli; Businger, Alexandra; Chang, Frank; Boxer, Robert B; Schnock, Kumiko O; Rozenblum, Ronen; Dykes, Patricia C; Dalal, Anuj K; Benneyan, James C; Lehmann, Lisa S; Gershanik, Esteban F; Bates, David W; Schnipper, Jeffrey L.
Afiliação
  • Bersani K; Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
  • Fuller TE; Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
  • Garabedian P; Partners Healthcare, Somerville, Massachusetts, United States.
  • Espares J; Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
  • Mlaver E; Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
  • Businger A; Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
  • Chang F; Partners Healthcare, Somerville, Massachusetts, United States.
  • Boxer RB; Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
  • Schnock KO; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
  • Rozenblum R; Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
  • Dykes PC; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
  • Dalal AK; Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
  • Benneyan JC; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
  • Lehmann LS; Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
  • Gershanik EF; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
  • Bates DW; Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
  • Schnipper JL; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Appl Clin Inform ; 11(1): 34-45, 2020 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31940670
BACKGROUND: Preventable adverse events continue to be a threat to hospitalized patients. Clinical decision support in the form of dashboards may improve compliance with evidence-based safety practices. However, limited research describes providers' experiences with dashboards integrated into vendor electronic health record (EHR) systems. OBJECTIVE: This study was aimed to describe providers' use and perceived usability of the Patient Safety Dashboard and discuss barriers and facilitators to implementation. METHODS: The Patient Safety Dashboard was implemented in a cluster-randomized stepped wedge trial on 12 units in neurology, oncology, and general medicine services over an 18-month period. Use of the Dashboard was tracked during the implementation period and analyzed in-depth for two 1-week periods to gather a detailed representation of use. Providers' perceptions of tool usability were measured using the Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale (rated 1-5). Research assistants conducted field observations throughout the duration of the study to describe use and provide insight into tool adoption. RESULTS: The Dashboard was used 70% of days the tool was available, with use varying by role, service, and time of day. On general medicine units, nurses logged in throughout the day, with many logins occurring during morning rounds, when not rounding with the care team. Prescribers logged in typically before and after morning rounds. On neurology units, physician assistants accounted for most logins, accessing the Dashboard during daily brief interdisciplinary rounding sessions. Use on oncology units was rare. Satisfaction with the tool was highest for perceived ease of use, with attendings giving the highest rating (4.23). The overall lowest rating was for quality of work life, with nurses rating the tool lowest (2.88). CONCLUSION: This mixed methods analysis provides insight into the use and usability of a dashboard tool integrated within a vendor EHR and can guide future improvements and more successful implementation of these types of tools.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde / Segurança do Paciente Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Appl Clin Inform Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde / Segurança do Paciente Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Appl Clin Inform Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos