Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Techniques for Treating Bilateral Breast Cancer Patients Using Pencil Beam Scanning Technology.
Vyfhuis, Melissa A L; Zhu, Mingyao; Agyepong, Benjamin; Nichols, Elizabeth M.
Afiliação
  • Vyfhuis MAL; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Zhu M; University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Agyepong B; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Nichols EM; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Int J Part Ther ; 6(2): 1-11, 2019.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31998816
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Patients with bilateral breast cancer (BBC), who require postmastectomy radiation therapy or radiation as part of breast conservation treatment, present a unique technical challenge. Even with modern techniques, such as intensity modulated radiation therapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), adequate target coverage is rarely achieved without the expense of increased integral dose to important organs at risk (OARs), such as the heart and lungs. Therefore, we present several BBC techniques and a treatment algorithm using intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for patients treated at our center. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We describe 3 different BBC treatment techniques using IMPT on patients treated at our center, with comparison VMAT plans to demonstrate the dosimetric benefit of proton therapy in these patients. Following RADCOMP (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) guidelines, a single physician approved all target volumes and OARs. Plans were designed so that ≥ 95% of the prescribed dose covered ≥ 95% of all targets. Parameters for dosimetric volume histograms for the clinical targets and OARs are reported for the 2 radiation methods.

RESULTS:

All methods demonstrated acceptable target coverage with 95% of the prescription planning target volume reaching a mean (± SD) of 98.0% (± 0.87%) and 97.5% (± 2.39%), for VMAT and IMPT plans, respectively. Conformity and homogeneity were also similar between the 2 techniques. Proton therapy provided observed improvements in mean heart dose (average heart mean [SD], 9.98 Gy [± 0.87 Gy] versus 2.12 Gy [± 0.96 Gy]) and total lung 5% prescription dose (V5; mean [SD] total lung V5, 97.9% [± 2.84%]), compared with 39.8% [± 9.39%]). All IMPT methods spared critical OARs; however, the single, 0° anterior-posterior plan allowed for the shortest treatment time.

CONCLUSION:

Both VMAT and all 3 IMPT techniques provided excellent target coverage in patients with BBC; however, proton therapy was superior in decreasing the dose to OARs. A single-field optimization approach should be the IMPT method of choice when feasible.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Outros_tipos Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Int J Part Ther Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Outros_tipos Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Int J Part Ther Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos