Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Recent Guidelines on the Management of Patients with Gastric Atrophy: Common Points and Controversies.
Matysiak-Budnik, Tamara; Camargo, Maria Constanza; Piazuelo, Maria Blanca; Leja, Marcis.
Afiliação
  • Matysiak-Budnik T; IMAD, Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Hôtel Dieu, Nantes University Hospital, INSERM 1235, 1, Place Alexis Ricordeau, 44093, Nantes, France. tamara.matysiakbudnik@chu-nantes.fr.
  • Camargo MC; Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
  • Piazuelo MB; Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Center for Mucosal Inflammation and Cancer, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Leja M; Institute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine, University of Latvia, 19 Raina Blvd., Riga, LV1586, Latvia.
Dig Dis Sci ; 65(7): 1899-1903, 2020 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32356261
Patients with gastric precancerous lesions (atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia) have increased risk of developing gastric cancer, and adequate management and surveillance of these patients should allow to reduce gastric cancer-related mortality. The guidelines on the management of these patients have been recently published by the European Societies (MAPS II guidelines) and by the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA). The aim of this commentary is to compare these two guidelines by highlighting the common points and differences between them. Both guidelines recommend a systematic detection and eradication of Helicobacter pylori in all patients with gastric atrophy. However, there is a major difference in the recommendations for surveillance: while the MAPS II guidelines recommend systematic endoscopic surveillance in all patients with severe gastric atrophy (with or without intestinal metaplasia), the AGA guidelines focus only on intestinal metaplasia and plead against systematic surveillance, leaving the possibility of surveillance in individual patients based on shared decision between clinicians and patients. The difference between two guidelines comes essentially from the different arguments used by two authorities (randomized control studies by AGA and observational cohort studies by the European Societies), and may be, at least in part, related to the difference between the European and American health care systems and potential economic burden.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Estomago Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Lesões Pré-Cancerosas / Estômago / Neoplasias Gástricas / Adenocarcinoma / Infecções por Helicobacter / Gastroscopia / Gastrite Atrófica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte / Europa Idioma: En Revista: Dig Dis Sci Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Estomago Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Lesões Pré-Cancerosas / Estômago / Neoplasias Gástricas / Adenocarcinoma / Infecções por Helicobacter / Gastroscopia / Gastrite Atrófica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte / Europa Idioma: En Revista: Dig Dis Sci Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França