Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The microbiome of diabetic foot ulcers: a comparison of swab and tissue biopsy wound sampling techniques using 16S rRNA gene sequencing.
Travis, J; Malone, M; Hu, H; Baten, A; Johani, K; Huygens, F; Vickery, K; Benkendorff, K.
Afiliação
  • Travis J; School of Environment, Science and Engineering, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW, Australia.
  • Malone M; Limb Preservation and Wound Research Academic Unit, Western Sydney LHD, Liverpool, Sydney, NSW, 2170, Australia.
  • Hu H; Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown Campus, Liverpool, Sydney, 2170, Australia.
  • Baten A; Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Sydney, NSW, 2170, Australia.
  • Johani K; Surgical Infection Research Group Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
  • Huygens F; Agresearch, Grasslands Research Centre, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
  • Vickery K; Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Sydney, NSW, 2170, Australia.
  • Benkendorff K; Central Military Laboratories and Blood Bank, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
BMC Microbiol ; 20(1): 163, 2020 06 16.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32546123
BACKGROUND: Health-care professionals need to collect wound samples to identify potential pathogens that contribute to wound infection. Obtaining appropriate samples from diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) where there is a suspicion of infection is of high importance. Paired swabs and tissue biopsies were collected from DFUs and both sampling techniques were compared using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. RESULTS: Mean bacterial abundance determined using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was significantly lower in tissue biopsies (p = 0.03). The mean number of reads across all samples was significantly higher in wound swabs [Formula: see text] = 32,014) compared to tissue ([Formula: see text] = 15,256, p = 0.001). Tissue biopsies exhibited greater overall diversity of bacteria relative to swabs (Shannon's H diversity p = 0.009). However, based on a presence/absence analysis of all paired samples, the frequency of occurrence of bacteria from genera of known and potential pathogens was generally higher in wound swabs than tissue biopsies. Multivariate analysis identified significantly different bacterial communities in swabs compared to tissue (p = 0.001). There was minimal correlation between paired wound swabs and tissue biopsies in the number and types of microorganisms. RELATE analysis revealed low concordance between paired DFU swab and tissue biopsy samples (Rho = 0.043, p = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: Using 16S rRNA gene sequencing this study identifies the potential for using less invasive swabs to recover high relative abundances of known and potential pathogen genera from DFUs when compared to the gold standard collection method of tissue biopsy.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bactérias / RNA Ribossômico 16S / Análise de Sequência de DNA / Pé Diabético Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Microbiol Assunto da revista: MICROBIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bactérias / RNA Ribossômico 16S / Análise de Sequência de DNA / Pé Diabético Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Microbiol Assunto da revista: MICROBIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália