Efficacy of noninvasive respiratory support modes as postextubation respiratory support in preterm neonates: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Pediatr Pulmonol
; 55(11): 2924-2939, 2020 11.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-32757365
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
Multiple noninvasive respiratory support (NRS) modalities are used for postextubation support in preterm neonates. Seven NRS modalities were compared-constant flow continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) (CF-CPAP) (bubble CPAP; ventilator CPAP), variable flow CPAP (VF-CPAP), high flow nasal cannula (HFNC), synchronized noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (S-NIPPV), nonsynchronized NIPPV (NS-NIPPV), bilevel CPAP (BiPAP), noninvasive high-frequency oscillation ventilation (nHFOV).DESIGN:
Systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) using the Bayesian random-effects approach. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, WHO-ICTRP were searched. MAIN OUTCOMEMEASURE:
Requirement of invasive mechanical ventilation within 7 days of extubation.RESULTS:
A total of 33 studies with 4080 preterm neonates were included. S-NIPPV, NS-NIPPV, nHFOV, and VF-CPAP were more efficacious in preventing reintubation than CF-CPAP (risk ratio [RR] [95% credible intervals {CrI}] 0.22 [0.12, 0.35]; 0.44 [0.27, 0.67]; 0.42 [0.18, 0.81]; 0.73 [0.52, 0.99]). Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value ranked S-NIPPV to be the best postextubation intervention (SUCRA 0.98). S-NIPPV was more effective than NS-NIPPV, BiPAP, VF-CPAP, and HFNC (RR [95% CrI] 0.52 [0.24, 0.97]; 0.32 [0.14, 0.64]; 0.30 [0.16, 0.50]; 0.24 [0.12, 0.41]). NS-NIPPV resulted in lesser reintubation compared to VF-CPAP and HFNC (RR [95% CrI] 0.61 [0.36, 0.97]; 0.49 [0.27, 0.80]). BiPAP, VF-CPAP, and HFNC had comparable efficacies. The overall quality of evidence was very low to moderate.CONCLUSION:
Results of this NMA indicate that S-NIPPV might be the most effective and CF-CPAP the least effective NRS modality for preventing extubation failure.Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Temas:
Geral
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Respiração Artificial
/
Recém-Nascido Prematuro
Tipo de estudo:
Clinical_trials
/
Systematic_reviews
Limite:
Humans
/
Newborn
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Pediatr Pulmonol
Assunto da revista:
PEDIATRIA
Ano de publicação:
2020
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
Reino Unido