Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Influence of Target Location, Size, and Patient Age on Normal Tissue Sparing- Proton and Photon Therapy in Paediatric Brain Tumour Patient-Specific Approach.
Dell'Oro, Mikaela; Short, Michala; Wilson, Puthenparampil; Hua, Chia-Ho; Gargone, Melissa; Merchant, Thomas E; Bezak, Eva.
Afiliação
  • Dell'Oro M; Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia.
  • Short M; Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide SA 5000, Australia.
  • Wilson P; Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia.
  • Hua CH; Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide SA 5000, Australia.
  • Gargone M; UniSA STEM, University of South Australia, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia.
  • Merchant TE; Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA.
  • Bezak E; Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA.
Cancers (Basel) ; 12(9)2020 Sep 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32927700
BACKGROUND: Proton radiotherapy produces superior dose distributions compared to photon radiotherapy, reducing side effects. Differences between the two modalities are not fully quantified in paediatric patients for various intracranial tumour sites or age. Understanding these differences may help clinicians estimate the benefit and improve referral across available centres. Our aim was to compare intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and intensity-modulated photon radiotherapy (IMRT) radiation doses for select paediatric intracranial tumours. METHODS: IMPT and IMRT dose distributions for gender-matched paediatric cranial CT-datasets (ages 5, 9 and 13 years) were retrospectively calculated to simulate irradiation of supratentorial (ependymoma) and infratentorial (medulloblastoma) target volumes diameters (1-3 cm) and position (central and 1-2 cm shifts). RESULTS: Clinical dosimetric objectives were achieved for all 216 treatment plans. Whilst infratentorial IMPT plans achieved greater maximum dose sparing to optic structures (4.8-12.6 Gy optic chiasm), brainstem sparing was limited (~0.5 Gy). Mean dose difference for optic chiasm was associated with medulloblastoma target position (p < 0.0197). Supratentorial IMPT plans demonstrated greater dose reduction for the youngest patients (pituitary gland p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Normal tissue sparing was achieved regardless of patient age for infratentorial tumours. However, for supratentorial tumours, there was a dosimetric advantage of IMPT across 9 vs. 13-year-old patients.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália