Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
MRI-targeted or systematic random biopsies for prostate cancer diagnosis in biopsy naïve patients: follow-up of a PRECISION trial-like retrospective cohort.
Luzzago, Stefano; de Cobelli, Ottavio; Mistretta, Francesco A; Piccinelli, Mattia Luca; Lorusso, Vito; Morelli, Michele; Bianchi, Roberto; Catellani, Michele; Cozzi, Gabriele; Di Trapani, Ettore; Pricolo, Paola; Alessi, Sarah; Ferro, Matteo; Marvaso, Giulia; Matei, Deliu-Victor; Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara Alicja; Petralia, Giuseppe; Musi, Gennaro.
Afiliação
  • Luzzago S; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy. stefanoluzzago@gmail.com.
  • de Cobelli O; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy. stefanoluzzago@gmail.com.
  • Mistretta FA; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy.
  • Piccinelli ML; Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
  • Lorusso V; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy.
  • Morelli M; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy.
  • Bianchi R; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
  • Catellani M; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy.
  • Cozzi G; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
  • Di Trapani E; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy.
  • Pricolo P; Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
  • Alessi S; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy.
  • Ferro M; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy.
  • Marvaso G; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy.
  • Matei DV; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy.
  • Jereczek-Fossa BA; Precision Imaging and Research Unit - Department of Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy.
  • Petralia G; Precision Imaging and Research Unit - Department of Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy.
  • Musi G; Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis ; 24(2): 406-413, 2021 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32989259
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

To test clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) rates during follow-up in biopsy naïve patients that underwent two different diagnostic pathways (1) SB GROUP (n = 354) systematic random biopsies (SB) vs. (2) TB GROUP (n = 264) multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and only targeted biopsies (TB) of PI-RADS ≥ 3 lesions. Patients with PI-RADS ≤ 2 score avoided prostate biopsies.

METHODS:

Retrospective single centre study of 618 biopsy naive patients (2015-2018). Two different definitions of csPCa were used (1) csPCa ISUP GG ≥ 2 (ISUP grade group [GG] ≥ 2) and (2) csPCa ISUP GG ≥ 3. Kaplan-Meier plots and univariable Cox regression models tested rates over time of csPCa ISUP GG ≥ 2 and caPCa ISUP GG ≥ 3 in SB GROUP vs. TB GROUP.

RESULTS:

At initial biopsy, TB achieved higher rates of csPCa ISUP GG ≥ 2 (35.3 vs. 18.9%; p < 0.001) and csPCa ISUP GG ≥ 3 (12.6 vs. 6.2%; p = 0.04), relative to SB. After a median time follow-up of 36 months, the rates of csPCa ISUP GG ≥ 2 (6.1 vs. 4.4%; p = 0.6) and csPCa ISUP GG ≥ 3 (3.3 vs. 1.1%; p = 0.2) were similar in SB GROUP vs. TB GROUP. Moreover, in TB GROUP patients that avoided prostate biopsies because of negative baseline mpMRI (n = 145), only 4.1% exhibited csPCa ISUP GG ≥ 2 during follow-up. Moreover, none of these patients (PI-RADS ≤ 2) had csPCa ISUP GG ≥ 3.

CONCLUSIONS:

In biopsy naïve setting, a diagnostic pathway including pre-biopsy mpMRI and TB of only PCa suspicious lesions is not associated with higher rates of csPCa during follow-up, relative to a diagnostic pathway of SB. Moreover, patients with negative baseline mpMRI could safely avoid prostate biopsies and could be followed with repeated PSA testing, since only a small proportion of them would harbor csPCa.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Prostata Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Ultrassonografia / Biópsia Guiada por Imagem Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Assunto da revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS / UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Prostata Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Ultrassonografia / Biópsia Guiada por Imagem Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Assunto da revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS / UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália