Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Spinal Anesthesia for Geriatric Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Comparative Case Series.
Lessing, Noah L; Edwards, Charles C; Dean, Clayton L; Waxter, Olive H; Lin, Charles; Curto, Ryan A; Brown, Charles H.
Afiliação
  • Lessing NL; The Maryland Spine Center.
  • Edwards CC; The Maryland Spine Center.
  • Dean CL; The Maryland Spine Center.
  • Waxter OH; The Maryland Spine Center.
  • Lin C; Department of Anesthesiology, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Curto RA; The Maryland Spine Center.
  • Brown CH; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Int J Spine Surg ; 14(5): 713-721, 2020 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33046538
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The use of spinal anesthesia (SA) as opposed to general anesthesia (GA) during elective lumbar spine surgery is an emerging technique and represents a potentially modifiable factor to limit perioperative complications. Few studies, however, have compared these anesthetic techniques in an elderly population. The aim of this study is to determine if SA is a safe alternative to GA for lumbar spine surgery in elderly patients.

METHODS:

A retrospective, consecutive case series study was performed. All patients aged 70 years and older who underwent lumbar spine decompression or combined decompression and fusion using either SA or GA during a 2-year period at a single institution were identified. Demographics and perioperative outcomes were compared.

RESULTS:

Of all patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 56 patients (19%) received SA and 239 (81%) received GA. Patients receiving SA were slightly older (median age, 77 years versus 75 years, P = .002), consisted of more men (57% versus 36%, P = .01), and had a lower mean body mass index (28.3 versus 30.1, P = .03). Indications for surgery and type of surgery were similar between groups. On average, operative times with SA were 101 minutes versus 103 minutes with GA (P = .71). After controlling for age, sex, and body mass index, patients receiving SA had decreased estimated blood loss (ß = -75 mL; 95% confidence interval [CI], -140.6, -9.4; P = .025) and intraoperative intravenous fluid requirements (ß = -205 mL; 95% CI, -389.4, -21.0; P = .029), shorter postanesthesia care unit stays (ß = -41 minutes; 95% CI, -64.6, -16.9; P = .001), lower maximum visual analog scale pain scores (ß = -0.89 points; 95% CI, -1.6, -0.1; P = .020), and decreased odds of receiving blood transfusion (odds ratio, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.01, 0.62; P = .45); there were no significant differences in operative time, length of stay, nausea, or oral morphine equivalents consumed per day. Complication rates were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION:

Spinal anesthesia is a reasonable, safe alternative to general anesthesia for lumbar spine surgery in elderly patients with degenerative conditions.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Int J Spine Surg Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Int J Spine Surg Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article