Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Outcomes of High Tibial Osteotomy With Versus Without Mesenchymal Stem Cell Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Tan, Si Heng Sharon; Kwan, Yiu Tsun; Neo, Wei Jian; Chong, Jia Yan; Kuek, Tze Yin Joshua; See, Jun Ze Fabian; Hui, James Hoipo.
Afiliação
  • Tan SHS; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore.
  • Kwan YT; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore.
  • Neo WJ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore.
  • Chong JY; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore.
  • Kuek TYJ; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore.
  • See JZF; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore.
  • Hui JH; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Health System, Singapore.
Orthop J Sports Med ; 9(6): 23259671211014840, 2021 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34212066
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The outcomes after high tibial osteotomy (HTO) with augmentation of intra-articular mesenchymal stem cell (MSCs) for medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis remain controversial.

PURPOSE:

To pool existing studies to compare the outcomes of HTO with versus without intra-articular MSC augmentation when performed for medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis. STUDY

DESIGN:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS:

The systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Included were clinical studies that compared the outcomes of HTO with intra-articular MSC augmentation (MSC group) versus without (control group). Pre- and postoperative outcomes were compared between groups from measures including the Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Rating Scale, Tegner score, visual analog scale for pain, arthroscopic and histological grading scales, femorotibial angle, weightbearing line, and posterior tibial slope.

RESULTS:

We reviewed 4 studies with a total of 224 patients. The MSC group demonstrated significantly greater improvement versus controls in the pooled Lysholm score (weighted mean difference [WMD], 6.64; 95% CI, 0.90 to 12.39) and pooled IKDC score (WMD, 9.21; 95% CI, 4.06 to 14.36), which were within or close to the minimal clinically important difference. Radiological outcomes were similar in both groups, including the femorotibial angle (WMD, -0.01; 95% CI, -1.10 to 1.09), weightbearing line, and posterior tibial slope. The studies were homogeneous, and no publication bias was noted.

CONCLUSION:

Intra-articular MSC augmentation for HTO may modestly improve functional outcomes as compared with HTO alone. However, adequate data are lacking to make definitive conclusions regarding the effect of MSC augmentation on pain or arthroscopic and histologic grading.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Orthop J Sports Med Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Singapura

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Orthop J Sports Med Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Singapura