Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Who Received At Least 3 Lines of Therapies.
Hamadani, Mehdi; Liao, Laura; Yang, Tony; Chen, Lei; Moskowitz, Craig.
Afiliação
  • Hamadani M; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
  • Liao L; ADC Therapeutics, New Providence, NJ. Electronic address: Laura.Liao@adctherapeutics.com.
  • Yang T; TYStats, LLC, Marlboro, NJ.
  • Chen L; ADC Therapeutics, New Providence, NJ.
  • Moskowitz C; Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami Health System, Miami, FL.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk ; 22(6): 373-381, 2022 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34933826
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The treatment landscape for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has recently changed. We examined characteristics and clinical outcomes of DLBCL patients who initiated a third (3L) and fourth (4L) line of therapy during a contemporary time frame. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Adult patients diagnosed with DLBCL who received ≥ 3L after January 1, 2014 were selected from the COTA database. Patients were grouped into cohorts by 3L or 4L initiation and further stratified by type of treatment received chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy (CT/CIT), targeted therapy (TT), chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T), or salvage therapy consolidated with hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). Patient characteristics, response rates, and overall survival (OS) were examined.

RESULTS:

Among adult patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) DLBCL, 212 (mean age; 61.8 years; 59.0% male) received their 3L and 127 (mean age 61.0 years; 61.4% male) their 4L. Among those treated with their 3L and 4L, 55.2% and 50.4%, respectively, received CT/CIT; 26.9% and 34.6% received TT. The complete response rate of 3L patients was 9.4% for CT/CIT, 10.5% for TT, and 60% for CAR-T. Similar findings were seen with 4L patients (CT/CIT 6.3%; TT 15.9%; CAR-T 53.8%). For those who received pharmacological treatment in 3L and 4L, median OS times were 7.7 and 4.4 months, respectively. Median OS times of patients who received cell-based therapies (CAR-T/HCT) were not reached.

CONCLUSION:

In this study, a majority of r/r DLBCL patients were treated with CT/CIT or TT in 3L and 4L settings and had poor clinical outcomes, underscoring the need for more effective treatments.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Outros_tipos Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Linfoma não Hodgkin / Imunoterapia Adotiva / Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B / Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Outros_tipos Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Linfoma não Hodgkin / Imunoterapia Adotiva / Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B / Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article