Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Vitamin D: Bolus Is Bogus-A Narrative Review.
Mazess, Richard B; Bischoff-Ferrari, Heike A; Dawson-Hughes, Bess.
Afiliação
  • Mazess RB; Department of Medical Physics University of Wisconsin Madison WI USA.
  • Bischoff-Ferrari HA; Department of Aging Medicine and Aging Research University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland.
  • Dawson-Hughes B; City Hospital Zurich University Clinic for Aging Medicine Zurich Switzerland.
JBMR Plus ; 5(12): e10567, 2021 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34950828
ABSTRACT
In this review we summarize the impact of bolus versus daily dosing of vitamin D on 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)2D levels, as well as on key countervailing factors that block vitamin D functions at the cellular level. Further, we discuss the role of bolus versus daily dosing of vitamin D for several health outcomes, including respiratory infections and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), rickets, falls and fractures, any cancer, and cancer-related mortality. This discussion appears timely because bolus doses continue to be tested for various disease outcomes despite a growing amount of evidence suggesting lack of efficacy or even detrimental effects of bolus dosing of vitamin D for outcomes where daily dosing at modest levels was effective in the vitamin D deficient. As a result, these discordant results may bias health recommendations for vitamin D if the recommendations are based on meta-analyses combining both daily and bolus dosing trials. © 2021 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: JBMR Plus Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: JBMR Plus Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article