Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Specificity of clinical decision support tools for vedolizumab and ustekinumab in biologically naïve patients with Crohn's disease.
Kim, Ji Eun; Won, Hojeong; Kim, Young-Ho; Kim, Eun Ran; Hong, Sung Noh; Chang, Dong Kyung.
Afiliação
  • Kim JE; Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Won H; Biomedical Statistics Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim YH; Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim ER; Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Hong SN; Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Chang DK; Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Scand J Gastroenterol ; 57(4): 446-448, 2022 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34967701
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

AIMS:

Clinical decision support tools (CDST) were developed to predict drug response to various biological treatments for Crohn's disease (CD). This study investigated whether CDSTs for vedolizumab (V-CDST) and ustekinumab (U-CDST) can be used as prognostic or drug-specific markers to predict response.

METHODS:

A hypothetical scenario involving 872 patients with CD who were exposed to the first biological therapy at Samsung Medical Center between 1995 and 2020 is presented. V-CDST & U-CDST were calculated based on clinical and laboratory data immediately before the first biologic was initiated. The Cumulative Link Mixed Model (CLMM) test, weighted Kappa and plot, and Spearman's correlation was used to determine the degree of agreement and difference between the two tools.

RESULTS:

25% of all patients diagnosed with biologically naïve CD were categorized into different probability groups using V-CDST and U-CDST. The difference between the two tools was significantly based on a two-sample paired ordinal test with Cumulative Link Mixed Model (CLMM) (p-value < .001). Concordance between the two tools with a total of 654 subjects (75% of all patients) showed a similar probability (weighted Kappa 0.47, 95% CI 0.41-0.52).

CONCLUSIONS:

V-CDST and U-CDST are useful in selecting vedolizumab or ustekinumab in 25% of biologically naïve CD patients in our hypothetical scenario.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença de Crohn / Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Scand J Gastroenterol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença de Crohn / Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Scand J Gastroenterol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article