Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Provider-perceived barriers to patient adherence to colorectal cancer screening.
Zhu, Xuan; Weiser, Emily; Jacobson, Debra J; Griffin, Joan M; Limburg, Paul J; Finney Rutten, Lila J.
Afiliação
  • Zhu X; Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Weiser E; Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Jacobson DJ; Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Griffin JM; Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Limburg PJ; Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Finney Rutten LJ; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Prev Med Rep ; 25: 101681, 2022 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35127359
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Average-risk colorectal cancer (CRC) screening remains underutilized in the US. Provider recommendation is strongly associated with CRC screening completion. To inform interventions aimed at improving screening uptake, we examined providers' perspectives on patient and health system barriers to CRC screening adherence, along with associated system-level interventions to improve uptake.

METHODS:

We conducted an online survey between November and December 2019 with a sample of primary care clinicians (PCCs) and gastroenterologists (GIs) from a validated panel of US clinicians (814 PCCs, 159 GIs; completion rates 25.3% for PCCs, 29.6% for GIs). Clinicians rated the extent to which each patient and health system factor interferes with patient adherence with CRC screening recommendations and the availability of practice interventions to improve screening rates.

RESULTS:

Provider-reported top barriers to CRC screening included patient discomfort with offered screening method (66%), cost (62-64%), and perceived low importance of screening (62%). Additional barriers included providers prioritizing urgent health concerns over screening (45-48%), not offering a choice of screening options (42-48%), lacking time to educate patients about screening (38-45%), and lacking education about available screening options (37-40%). Most frequently reported system-level interventions to improve CRC screening rates included patient education materials (57-62%) and point of care prompts (56-61%). Other interventions were less frequently reported, although variations existed by clinical specialty regarding barriers and interventions.

CONCLUSIONS:

Addressing barriers to CRC screening requires system-level interventions, including provider training on shared decision-making, automated scheduling and reminder processes, and policies to increase clinician time for preventive screening consultations.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Colon_e_reto Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: Prev Med Rep Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Colon_e_reto Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: Prev Med Rep Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos