Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of scoring systems regarding the gender as a parameter with the traditional scoring systems for predicting appendicitis.
Capoglu, Recayi; Gonullu, Emre; Bayhan, Zulfu; Coskun, Murat; Harmantepe, Tarik; Kucuk, Furkan.
Afiliação
  • Capoglu R; General Surgery Department, Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey.
  • Gonullu E; General Surgery Department, Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey.
  • Bayhan Z; Faculty of Medicine, General Surgery Department, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey. zulfubayhan@gmail.com.
  • Coskun M; General Surgery Department, Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey.
  • Harmantepe T; General Surgery Department, Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey.
  • Kucuk F; General Surgery Department, Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey.
Updates Surg ; 74(3): 1035-1042, 2022 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35446009
ABSTRACT
Although acute appendicitis remains the most common cause of acute abdomen in General Surgery practice, negative appendectomy rates are still high in particularly female patients. Appendicitis scoring systems considering gender can help the clinician to reduce negative appendectomy rates in females. This present study aims to compare the Lintula, Ripasa, Fenyo-Lindberg scoring systems, which use gender as a variable, with the Alvarado, Karaman, scoring systems to evaluate which CSS is more successful in the differential diagnosis of appendicitis in females. We analyzed the records of the patients operated on with a prediagnosis of acute appendicitis in our clinic between 2020 and 2021, retrospectively. Alvarado, adult appendicitis score (AAS), appendicitis inflammatory response score (AIRS), Ripasa, Karaman, Lintula, and Fenyo Lindberg scores were calculated for each patient. The patients were divided into two groups as male and female, according to gender. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to identify the best cut-off value and assess the performance of the test score for appendicitis. Three hundred and sixty-three patients were included in the study. One hundred seventy-two (47.4%) of the patients were male, and 191 (52.6%) were female. Alvarado and AAS were the most valuable score in female (AUC 0.805, sensitivity 0.63, specificity 0.83; and area under curve (AUC) 0.794, Sensitivity 0.71, Specificity 0.76, respectively), male group (AUC 0.828, Sensitivity 0.71, Specificity 0.83; and AUC 0.834, Sensitivity 0.74, Specificity 0.77, respectively), and when patients were not categorized by gender (AUC 0.818, Sensitivity 0.67 Specificity 0.83; and AUC 0.794, Sensitivity 0.71, Specificity 0.76, respectively). Although the Alvarado scoring system is the first defined appendicitis scoring system, it seems as superior to the many scoring systems defined after it in predicting appendicitis, even in female patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Apendicite Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Updates Surg Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Turquia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Apendicite Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Updates Surg Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Turquia