Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Chemoradiation vs. local excision in the management of early squamous cell carcinoma of the anus: a systematic review.
Portale, Giuseppe; Parotto, Matteo; Pozza, Anna; Scarpa, Marco; Cavallin, Francesco.
Afiliação
  • Portale G; Department of General Surgery, ULSS 6 Euganea, Cittadella, Padua, Italy. portale.giuseppe@libero.it.
  • Parotto M; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Pozza A; Department of General Surgery, ULSS 2 MULLarca Trevigiana, Treviso, Italy.
  • Scarpa M; Department of General Surgery, University of Padova Medica Sciences, Padua, Italy.
  • Cavallin F; Independent Statistician, Solagna, Italy.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 37(9): 1937-1944, 2022 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36002749
PURPOSE: Squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) suffers a constant increase each year in the last decades. Recent studies suggested the possibility of local excision (LE) as an option for early-stage SCAC patients. This systematic review aims to summarize the available evidence on the comparison of LE vs. chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in the treatment of early SCCA patients. METHODS: We conducted a literature review including MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, clinicaltrials.gov, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews through June 2022. MOOSE guidelines were followed. We used the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) tool to assess quality. Data on survival and procedure-associated costs were extracted. RESULTS: Four retrospective studies including 3323 patients were included. They were all comparative retrospective cohort studies (three were registry-based studies, either NCDB or SEER) with a MINORS score of 16-19 points. Overall survival (OS) was comparable between LE and CRT patients in three studies, with a 5-year OS of 85.3-100% in LE patients and 85-91.6% in CRT patients. One study investigated cancer-specific survival (CSS) and reported similar 5-year CSS in LE (98%) and CRT patients (96%). One investigated progression-free survival (PFS) and did not report any statistically significant difference in 5-year PFS between LE (91%) and CRT patients (83%). Only one study considered the mean costs associated with the two approaches (29,210 USD with LE and 46,350 USD with CRT). CONCLUSIONS: LE may potentially be considered a valid alternative to CRT for patients with early-stage SCAA. Results of prospective randomized long-term trials comparing LE with CRT are warranted to draw definitive conclusions and consider LE as a true cost-effective strategy for T1N0 SCCA with similar oncologic results offered by CRT, which-to date-remains the "gold standard." PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42022338750.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Colon_e_reto Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Ânus / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Colorectal Dis Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Colon_e_reto Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Ânus / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Int J Colorectal Dis Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália