Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A multicenter study of ICU resource utilization in pediatric, adolescent and young adult patients post CAR-T therapy.
Ragoonanan, Dristhi; Bhar, Saleh; Mohan, Gopi; Beltramo, Fernando; Khazal, Sajad J; Hurley, Caitlin; Andersen, Clark; Margossian, Steven; Neelapu, Sattva S; Shpall, Elizabeth; Gutierrez, Cristina; Tewari, Priti; Shoberu, Basirat; Talleur, Aimee; McCall, David; Nunez, Cesar; Cuglievan, Branko; Tambaro, Francesco Paolo; Petropoulos, Demetrios; Abdel-Azim, Hisham; Mahadeo, Kris M.
Afiliação
  • Ragoonanan D; Department of Pediatrics, Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Bhar S; Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Mohan G; Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
  • Beltramo F; Children's Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
  • Khazal SJ; Department of Pediatrics, Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Hurley C; Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, United States.
  • Andersen C; Department of Biostatistics, Division of Basic Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Margossian S; Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
  • Neelapu SS; Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Shpall E; Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Gutierrez C; Department of Critical Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Tewari P; Department of Pediatrics, Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Shoberu B; Department of Pediatrics, Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Talleur A; Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, United States.
  • McCall D; Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Nunez C; Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Cuglievan B; Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Tambaro FP; Pediatric Stem Cell Transplantation and Cell Therapy Program, UOC SIT-TMO AORN Santobono-Pausilipon, Napoli, Italy.
  • Petropoulos D; Department of Pediatrics, Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
  • Abdel-Azim H; Division of Transplant and Cell Therapy, Loma Linda University Cancer Center, Loma Linda, CA, United States.
  • Mahadeo KM; Department of Pediatrics, Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Front Oncol ; 12: 1022901, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36353531
Tisagenlecleucel is associated with remarkable outcomes in treating patients up to the age of 25 years with refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Yet, due to unique and potentially life-threatening complications, access remains limited to higher-resource and certified centers. Reports of inequity and related disparities in care are emerging. In this multicenter study of ALL patients admitted for anti-leukemia therapy, who required pediatric intensive care (ICU) support (n = 205), patients receiving tisagenlecleucel (n = 39) were compared to those receiving conventional chemotherapy (n = 166). The median time to ICU transfer was 6 (0-43) versus 1 (0-116) days, respectively (p < 0.0001). There was no difference in the use of vasopressor, ionotropic, sedating, and/or paralytic agents between groups, but use of dexamethasone was higher among tisagenlecleucel patients. Patients receiving tisagenlecleucel were more likely to have cardiorespiratory toxicity (p = 0.0002), but there were no differences in diagnostic interventions between both groups and/or differences in ICU length of stay and/or overall hospital survival. Toxicities associated with tisagenlecleucel are generally reversible, and our findings suggest that resource utilization once admitted to the ICU may be similar among patients with ALL receiving tisagenlecleucel versus conventional chemotherapy. As centers consider improved access to care and the feasibility of tisagenlecleucel certification, our study may inform strategic planning.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Front Oncol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Front Oncol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos