Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sex- and age-specific normal values for automated quantitative pixel-wise myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Brown, Louise A E; Gulsin, Gaurav S; Onciul, Sebastian C; Broadbent, David A; Yeo, Jian L; Wood, Alice L; Saunderson, Christopher E D; Das, Arka; Jex, Nicholas; Chowdhary, Amrit; Thirunavukarasu, Sharmaine; Sharrack, Noor; Knott, Kristopher D; Levelt, Eylem; Swoboda, Peter P; Xue, Hui; Greenwood, John P; Moon, James C; Adlam, David; McCann, Gerry P; Kellman, Peter; Plein, Sven.
Afiliação
  • Brown LAE; Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre (MCRC) and Department of Biomedical Imaging Science, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
  • Gulsin GS; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and Cardiovascular Theme, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, UK.
  • Onciul SC; Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre (MCRC) and Department of Biomedical Imaging Science, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
  • Broadbent DA; Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre (MCRC) and Department of Biomedical Imaging Science, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
  • Yeo JL; Medical Physics and Engineering, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
  • Wood AL; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and Cardiovascular Theme, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, UK.
  • Saunderson CED; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and Cardiovascular Theme, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, UK.
  • Das A; Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre (MCRC) and Department of Biomedical Imaging Science, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
  • Jex N; Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre (MCRC) and Department of Biomedical Imaging Science, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
  • Chowdhary A; Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre (MCRC) and Department of Biomedical Imaging Science, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
  • Thirunavukarasu S; Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre (MCRC) and Department of Biomedical Imaging Science, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
  • Sharrack N; Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre (MCRC) and Department of Biomedical Imaging Science, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
  • Knott KD; Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre (MCRC) and Department of Biomedical Imaging Science, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
  • Levelt E; Barts Heart Centre, The Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging Unit and The Inherited Cardiovascular Diseases Unit, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK.
  • Swoboda PP; Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre (MCRC) and Department of Biomedical Imaging Science, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
  • Xue H; Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre (MCRC) and Department of Biomedical Imaging Science, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
  • Greenwood JP; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Moon JC; Multidisciplinary Cardiovascular Research Centre (MCRC) and Department of Biomedical Imaging Science, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
  • Adlam D; Barts Heart Centre, The Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging Unit and The Inherited Cardiovascular Diseases Unit, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London, UK.
  • McCann GP; Medical Physics and Engineering, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
  • Kellman P; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester and Cardiovascular Theme, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, UK.
  • Plein S; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging ; 24(4): 426-434, 2023 03 21.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36458882
AIMS: Recently developed in-line automated cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) myocardial perfusion mapping has been shown to be reproducible and comparable with positron emission tomography (PET), and can be easily integrated into clinical workflows. Bringing quantitative myocardial perfusion CMR into routine clinical care requires knowledge of sex- and age-specific normal values in order to define thresholds for disease detection. This study aimed to establish sex- and age-specific normal values for stress and rest CMR myocardial blood flow (MBF) in healthy volunteers. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 151 healthy volunteers recruited from two centres underwent adenosine stress and rest myocardial perfusion CMR. In-line automatic reconstruction and post processing of perfusion data were implemented within the Gadgetron software framework, creating pixel-wise perfusion maps. Rest and stress MBF were measured, deriving myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) and were subdivided by sex and age. Mean MBF in all subjects was 0.62 ± 0.13 mL/g/min at rest and 2.24 ± 0.53 mL/g/min during stress. Mean MPR was 3.74 ± 1.00. Compared with males, females had higher rest (0.69 ± 0.13 vs. 0.58 ± 0.12 mL/g/min, P < 0.01) and stress MBF (2.41 ± 0.47 vs. 2.13 ± 0.54 mL/g/min, P = 0.001). Stress MBF and MPR showed significant negative correlations with increasing age (r = -0.43, P < 0.001 and r = -0.34, P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Fully automated in-line CMR myocardial perfusion mapping produces similar normal values to the published CMR and PET literature. There is a significant increase in rest and stress MBF, but not MPR, in females and a reduction of stress MBF and MPR with advancing age, advocating the use of sex- and age-specific reference ranges for diagnostic use.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença da Artéria Coronariana / Imagem de Perfusão do Miocárdio Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Eur heart j cardiovasc imaging Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença da Artéria Coronariana / Imagem de Perfusão do Miocárdio Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Eur heart j cardiovasc imaging Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article