Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Determining HER2 Status by Artificial Intelligence: An Investigation of Primary, Metastatic, and HER2 Low Breast Tumors.
Palm, Christiane; Connolly, Catherine E; Masser, Regina; Padberg Sgier, Barbara; Karamitopoulou, Eva; Simon, Quentin; Bode, Beata; Tinguely, Marianne.
Afiliação
  • Palm C; Pathologie Institute Enge, 8005 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Connolly CE; Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Masser R; Pathologie Institute Enge, 8005 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Padberg Sgier B; Pathologie Institute Enge, 8005 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Karamitopoulou E; Pathologie Institute Enge, 8005 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Simon Q; Pathologie Institute Enge, 8005 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Bode B; Pathologie Institute Enge, 8005 Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Tinguely M; Pathologie Institute Enge, 8005 Zurich, Switzerland.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 13(1)2023 Jan 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36611460
ABSTRACT
The expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) protein or gene transcripts is critical for therapeutic decision making in breast cancer. We examined the performance of a digitalized and artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted workflow for HER2 status determination in accordance with the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of Pathologists (CAP) guidelines. Our preliminary cohort consisted of 495 primary breast carcinomas, and our study cohort included 67 primary breast carcinomas and 30 metastatic deposits, which were evaluated for HER2 status by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH). Three practicing breast pathologists independently assessed and scored slides, building the ground truth. Following a washout period, pathologists were provided with the results of the AI digital image analysis (DIA) and asked to reassess the slides. Both rounds of assessment from the pathologists were compared to the AI results and ground truth for each slide. We observed an overall HER2 positivity rate of 15% in our study cohort. Moderate agreement (Cohen's κ 0.59) was observed between the ground truth and AI on IHC, with most discrepancies occurring between 0 and 1+ scores. Inter-observer agreement amongst pathologists was substantial (Fleiss´ κ 0.77) and pathologists' agreement with AI scores was 80.6%. Substantial agreement of the AI with the ground truth (Cohen´s κ 0.80) was detected on ISH-stained slides, and the accuracy of AI was similar for the primary and metastatic tumors. We demonstrated the feasibility of a combined HER2 IHC and ISH AI workflow, with a Cohen's κ of 0.94 when assessed in accordance with the ASCO/CAP recommendations.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Diagnostics (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suíça

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Diagnostics (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suíça