Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Truth of Colorectal Enhanced Recovery Programs: Process Measure Compliance in 151 Hospitals.
Shah, Tejen A; Knapp, Leandra; Cohen, Mark E; Brethauer, Stacy A; Wick, Elizabeth C; Ko, Clifford Y.
Afiliação
  • Shah TA; From the Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons (Shah, Knapp, Cohen, Ko).
  • Knapp L; Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH (Shah, Brethauer).
  • Cohen ME; From the Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons (Shah, Knapp, Cohen, Ko).
  • Brethauer SA; From the Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons (Shah, Knapp, Cohen, Ko).
  • Wick EC; Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH (Shah, Brethauer).
  • Ko CY; Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (Wick).
J Am Coll Surg ; 236(4): 543-550, 2023 04 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36852926
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Commonly cited studies have reported substantial improvements (defined as >20%) in process measure compliance after implementation of colorectal enhanced recovery programs (ERPs). However, hospitals have anecdotally reported difficulties in achieving similar improvement gains. This study evaluates improvement uniformity among 151 hospitals exposed to an 18-month implementation protocol for 6 colorectal ERP process measures (oral antibiotics, mechanical bowel preparation, multimodal pain control, early mobilization, early liquid intake, and early solid intake). STUDY

DESIGN:

One hundred fifty-one hospitals implemented a colorectal ERP with pathway, educational and supporting materials, and data capture protocols; 906 opportunities existed for process compliance improvement across the cohort (151 hospitals × 6 process measures). However, 240 opportunities were excluded due to high starting compliance rates (ie compliance >80%) and 3 opportunities were excluded because compliance rates were recorded for fewer than 2 cases. Thus, 663 opportunities for improvement across 151 hospitals were studied.

RESULTS:

Of 663 opportunities, minimal improvement (0% to 20% increase in compliance) occurred in 52% of opportunities, substantial improvement (>20% increase in compliance) in 20%, and worsening compliance occurred in 28%. Of the 6 processes, multimodal pain control and use of oral antibiotics improved the most.

CONCLUSIONS:

Contrary to published ERP literature, the majority of study hospitals had difficulty improving process compliance with 80% of the opportunities not achieving substantial improvement. This discordance between ERP implementation success rates reported in the literature and what is observed in a large sample could reflect differences in hospitals' culture or characteristics, or a publication bias. Attention needs to be directed toward improving ERP adoption across the spectrum of hospital types.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Colon_e_reto Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Am Coll Surg Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Colon_e_reto Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Colorretais / Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Am Coll Surg Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article