Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Perioperative perampanel administration for early seizure prophylaxis in brain tumor patients.
Kusakabe, Kosuke; Inoue, Akihiro; Watanabe, Hideaki; Nakamura, Yawara; Nishikawa, Masahiro; Ohtsuka, Yoshihiro; Ogura, Masahiro; Shigekawa, Seiji; Taniwaki, Mashio; Kitazawa, Riko; Kunieda, Takeharu.
Afiliação
  • Kusakabe K; Department of Neurosurgery, Ehime University School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.
  • Inoue A; Department of Neurosurgery, Ehime University School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.
  • Watanabe H; Department of Neurosurgery, Ehime University School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.
  • Nakamura Y; Department of Neurosurgery, Ehime University School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.
  • Nishikawa M; Department of Neurosurgery, Ehime University School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.
  • Ohtsuka Y; Department of Neurosurgery, Ehime University School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.
  • Ogura M; Department of Rehabilitation, Ehime University Hospital, Toon, Japan.
  • Shigekawa S; Department of Neurosurgery, Ehime University School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.
  • Taniwaki M; Division of Diagnostic Pathology, Ehime University Hospital, Toon, Japan.
  • Kitazawa R; Division of Diagnostic Pathology, Ehime University Hospital, Toon, Japan.
  • Kunieda T; Department of Neurosurgery, Ehime University School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.
Surg Neurol Int ; 14: 287, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37680915
Background: The efficacy of perioperative prophylactic antiepileptic drug therapy in "seizure-naïve" patients with brain tumor, including glioblastoma (GBM), remains controversial. This study investigated whether perampanel (PER) is effective and safe for preventing perioperative onset of epileptic seizures, so-called early seizure, in patients with brain tumors. Methods: Forty-five patients underwent tumor resection through craniotomy for a primary supratentorial brain tumor at Ehime University Hospital between April 2021 and July 2022. PER was administered from the 1st to the 6th day after surgery for seizure prophylaxis. Occurrence of early seizure, hematological toxicities, and various side effects were recorded on postoperative days 7 and 14. In addition, the clinical course of these patients was compared with 42 brain tumor patients under the same treatment protocol who received levetiracetam (LEV) for seizure prophylaxis between April 2017 and October 2018. Results: In 45 patients with brain tumor, including GBM, who received PER administration, no early seizures were identified within 7 days postoperatively. No adverse drug reactions such as hematological toxicity, liver or kidney dysfunction, or exanthematous drug eruption were observed in any cases. As side effects, somnolence was reported in 14 patients (31.1%), vertigo in 3 patients (6.7%), and headache in 3 patients (6.7%). Although somnolence and vertigo were difficult to assess in the case of intraparenchymal tumors, particularly GBM, these side effects were not identified in patients with extraparenchymal tumors such as meningiomas, epidermoid cysts, and pituitary adenomas. In addition, no significant differences were identified compared to patients who received LEV. Conclusion: The efficacy and safety of PER in preventing early seizures among patients with brain tumors were retrospectively evaluated. Perioperative administration of PER to patients with brain tumors may reduce the risk of early seizures without incurring serious side effects, showing no significant differences compared to patients who received LEV.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Surg Neurol Int Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline Idioma: En Revista: Surg Neurol Int Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão