Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cascade testing for hereditary cancer: comprehensive multigene panels identify unexpected actionable findings in relatives.
Heald, Brandie; Pirzadeh-Miller, Sara; Ellsworth, Rachel E; Nielsen, Sarah M; Russell, Emily M; Beitsch, Peter; Esplin, Edward D; Nussbaum, Robert L; Pineda-Alvarez, Daniel E; Kurian, Allison W; Hampel, Heather.
Afiliação
  • Heald B; Medical Affairs, Invitae Corp, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Pirzadeh-Miller S; Cancer Genetics, University of Texas Southwestern/Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Ellsworth RE; Medical Affairs, Invitae Corp, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Nielsen SM; Medical Affairs, Invitae Corp, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Russell EM; Medical Affairs, Invitae Corp, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Beitsch P; Medical Affairs, Invitae Corp, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Esplin ED; Medical Affairs, Invitae Corp, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Nussbaum RL; Medical Affairs, Invitae Corp, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Pineda-Alvarez DE; Medical Affairs, Invitae Corp, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Kurian AW; Division of Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
  • Hampel H; Division of Clinical Cancer Genomics, Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 116(2): 334-337, 2024 Feb 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37756683
ABSTRACT
Current guidelines recommend single variant testing in relatives of patients with known pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants in cancer predisposition genes. This approach may preclude the use of risk-reducing strategies in family members who have pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants in other cancer predisposition genes. Cascade testing using multigene panels was performed in 3696 relatives of 7433 probands. Unexpected pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants were identified in 230 (6.2%) relatives, including 144 who were negative for the familial pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant but positive for a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in a different gene than the proband and 74 who tested positive for the familial pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant and had an additional pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant in a different gene than the proband. Of the relatives with unexpected pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants, 36.3% would have qualified for different or additional cancer screening recommendations. Limiting cascade testing to only the familial pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant would have resulted in missed, actionable findings for a subset of relatives.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Prevencao_e_fatores_de_risco / Hereditariedade / Tipos_de_cancer / Outros_tipos Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Predisposição Genética para Doença / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Natl Cancer Inst Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Prevencao_e_fatores_de_risco / Hereditariedade / Tipos_de_cancer / Outros_tipos Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Predisposição Genética para Doença / Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Natl Cancer Inst Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos