Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic Accuracy of Up-Front PET/CT and MRI for Detecting Cervical Lymph Node Metastases in T1-T2 Oral Cavity Cancer-A Prospective Cohort Study.
Madsen, Christoffer Bing; Rohde, Max; Gerke, Oke; Godballe, Christian; Sørensen, Jens Ahm.
Afiliação
  • Madsen CB; Department of Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark.
  • Rohde M; Research Unit for Plastic Surgery, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark.
  • Gerke O; Department of ORL-Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark.
  • Godballe C; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark.
  • Sørensen JA; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 13(22)2023 Nov 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37998552
ABSTRACT
The diagnostic accuracy of up-front 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for detecting cervical lymph node metastases in patients with T1-T2 oral squamous cell carcinoma is reported with large discrepancies across the literature. We investigated the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and accuracy of up-front PET/CT for detecting cervical lymph node metastases in this patient group and compared the performance to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In this prospective cohort study, 76 patients with T1-T2 oral squamous cell carcinoma underwent an up-front PET/CT and MRI at the Odense University Hospital from September 2013 to February 2016. Sentinel node biopsy and elective neck dissection were used for histopathological verification of the imaging modalities. Up-front PET/CT was significantly more sensitive than neck MRI (74% vs. 27%, p = 0.0001), but less specific (60% vs. 88%, p = 0.001). The accuracy of PET/CT and neck MRI was comparable (66% vs. 63%, p = 0.85), the PPV was slightly in favor of neck MRI (56% vs. 62%, p = 0.73), the NPV was slightly in favor of PET/CT (77% vs. 63%, p = 0.16). Neither PET/CT nor neck MRI should stand alone for N-staging T1-T2 oral cavity cancer.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Outros_tipos Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Diagnostics (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Dinamarca

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Outros_tipos Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Diagnostics (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Dinamarca