Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The impact of margin reduction on radiation dose distribution of ultra-hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy utilizing a 1.5-T MR-Linac.
Onal, Cem; Efe, Esma; Bozca, Recep; Yavas, Cagdas; Yavas, Guler; Arslan, Gungor.
Afiliação
  • Onal C; Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Efe E; Adana Dr. Turgut Noyan Research and Treatment Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Turkey.
  • Bozca R; Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Yavas C; Adana Dr. Turgut Noyan Research and Treatment Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Turkey.
  • Yavas G; Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Arslan G; Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 25(1): e14179, 2024 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38013636
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

We examined the effects of reducing the planning target volume (PTV) margin in MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) on the distribution of radiation dose to target volumes and organs-at-risk (OARs). Thus, we compared MR-Linac (MRL) plans with and without reduced margin and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plan with conventional linac for low-risk prostate cancer patients receiving 36.25 Gy in five fractions of ultra-hypofractionated radiation therapy. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Twenty low-risk prostate cancer patients treated with 1.5 T MR-Linac were evaluated. The same planning CT images were used for four plans the MRL-R plan with reduced margin planning target volume (PTV-R) and the MRL-N plan with normal margin PTV (PTV-N), which is also used for IMRT plan. In four plans, PTV doses, organs-at-risk (OARs) doses, the homogeneity index (HI), and monitor units were compared.

RESULTS:

All plans met the criteria for PTV coverage and OARs dose constraints. The maximum and mean PTV doses were significantly higher in the MRL-R and MRL-N plans compared to the IMRT plan. The HI was lowest in the IMRT plan (0.040 ± 0.013) and highest in the MRL-N plan (0.055 ± 0.012; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the PTV dosimetric parameters between the MRL-R and the MRL-N plans. The high doses in the rectum was significantly lower in the MRL-R compared to other plans. The bladder V36.25 Gy was significantly lower in the MRL-R plan (2.43 ± 1.87 Gy) compared to MRL-N (4.50 ± 2.42 Gy; p < 0.001), and IMRT plans (4.76 ± 2.77 Gy; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the low-dose volumes of the body, maximum femur doses, or monitor units across each plan.

CONCLUSIONS:

Ultra-hypofractionated MR-guided RT with 1.5 T MRL is dosimetrically feasible for patients with prostate cancer. The improved soft tissue contrast and the online adaptive plan for 1.5 T MR-Linac allows for PTV margin reduction resulted in a significant dose reduction in OARs.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Prevencao_e_fatores_de_risco / Agentes_cancerigenos / Tipos_de_cancer / Outros_tipos / Tratamento / Radioterapia Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Appl Clin Med Phys Assunto da revista: BIOFISICA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Turquia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Prevencao_e_fatores_de_risco / Agentes_cancerigenos / Tipos_de_cancer / Outros_tipos / Tratamento / Radioterapia Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Appl Clin Med Phys Assunto da revista: BIOFISICA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Turquia