Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The value of national accreditation program for rectal cancer: A survey of accredited programs and programs seeking accreditation.
Kapadia, Muneera R; Senatore, Peter J; Messick, Craig; Hull, Tracy L; Shaffer, Virginia O; Morris, Arden M; Dietz, David W; Wexner, Steven D; Wick, Elizabeth C.
Afiliação
  • Kapadia MR; Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC.
  • Senatore PJ; Inspira Health, Rowan University School of Medicine, Vineland, NJ.
  • Messick C; Department of Surgery, MD Anderson, Houston, TX.
  • Hull TL; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
  • Shaffer VO; Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
  • Morris AM; Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA.
  • Dietz DW; Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH.
  • Wexner SD; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL.
  • Wick EC; Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA. Electronic address: elizabeth.wick@ucsf.edu.
Surgery ; 175(4): 1007-1012, 2024 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38267342
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Significant variation in rectal cancer care has been demonstrated in the United States. The National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer was established in 2017 to improve the quality of rectal cancer care through standardization and emphasis on a multidisciplinary approach. The aim of this study was to understand the perceived value and barriers to achieving the National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer accreditation.

METHODS:

An electronic survey was developed, piloted, and distributed to rectal cancer programs that had already achieved or were interested in pursuing the National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer accreditation. The survey contained 40 questions with a combination of Likert scale, multiple choice, and open-ended questions to provide comments. This was a mixed methods study; descriptive statistics were used to analyze the quantitative data, and thematic analysis was used to analyze the qualitative data.

RESULTS:

A total of 85 rectal cancer programs were sent the survey (22 accredited, 63 interested). Responses were received from 14 accredited programs and 41 interested programs. Most respondents were program directors (31%) and program coordinators (40%). The highest-ranked responses regarding the value of the National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer accreditation included "improved quality and culture of rectal cancer care," "enhanced program organization and coordination," and "challenges our program to provide optimal, high-quality care." The most frequently cited barriers to the National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer accreditation were cost and lack of personnel.

CONCLUSION:

Our survey found significant perceived value in the National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer accreditation. Adhering to standards and a multidisciplinary approach to rectal cancer care are critical components of a high-quality care rectal cancer program.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Colon_e_reto Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Internato e Residência Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Surgery Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Nova Caledônia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Colon_e_reto Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Internato e Residência Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Surgery Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Nova Caledônia