Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Predictive value of controlling nutritional status score for prostate cancer diagnosis.
Huang, Jiaguo; Sun, Ji; Hua, Runmiao; Fan, Yi; Wang, Kai; Zheng, Liying; Qian, Biao.
Afiliação
  • Huang J; Department of Urology, Affiliated Xiaoshan Hospital, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
  • Sun J; Department of Urology, Affiliated Xiaoshan Hospital, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
  • Hua R; Department of Urology, Affiliated Xiaoshan Hospital, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
  • Fan Y; Department of Urology, Affiliated Xiaoshan Hospital, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
  • Wang K; Department of Urology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
  • Zheng L; Department of Graduate, The First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical College, Ganzhou, China.
  • Qian B; Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical College, Ganzhou, China.
Front Oncol ; 14: 1268800, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38450184
ABSTRACT

Objective:

This study aims to explore the predictive value of the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis.

Methods:

The data of 114 patients who underwent prostate needle biopsies from June 2020 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The relationship between CONUT score and various clinical factors as well as PCa diagnosis was evaluated.

Results:

The pathological results classified patients into the PCa (n = 38) and non-PCa (n = 76) groups. Compared with the non-PCa group, the PCa group exhibited statistically significant differences in age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA density (PSAD), the proportion of PI-RADS ≥ 3 in mpMRI, and the CONUT score, prostate volume, lymphocyte count, and total cholesterol concentration (p < 0.05). ROC curve analyses indicated the diagnostic accuracy as follows age (AUC = 0.709), prostate volume (AUC = 0.652), PSA (AUC = 0.689), PSAD (AUC = 0.76), PI-RADS ≥ 3 in mpMRI (AUC = 0.846), and CONUT score (AUC = 0.687). When CONUT score was combined with PSA and PSAD, AUC increased to 0.784. The AUC of CONUT score combined with PSA, PSAD, and mpMRI was 0.881, indicates a higher diagnostic value. Based on the optimal cut-off value of CONUT score, compared with the low CONUT score group, the high CONUT score group has a higher positive rate of PCa diagnosis (p < 0.05).

Conclusion:

CONUT score is an excellent auxiliary index for PCa diagnosis in addition to the commonly used PSA, PSAD, and mpMRI in clinical practice. Further prospective trials with a larger sample size are warranted to confirm the present study findings.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Prostata Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Oncol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Prostata Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Oncol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China