Endomyocardial biopsy in clinical practice: the diagnostic yield and insights from a 5-year single-center experience.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is a diagnostic tool for evaluating various cardiac conditions, such as myocarditis and myocardial infiltrative diseases. It is also the gold standard screening technique for detecting allograft rejection after heart transplantation. Despite advances in noninvasive imaging modalities for myocardial tissue characterization, EMB is still necessary for making a definitive diagnosis and determining treatment for certain conditions. Herein, we report our recent experience using EMB and its diagnostic yield. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed EMBs performed at our institution from March 2018 through March 2023. Clinical data, including patient characteristics, indication and diagnostic yield of EMB, and procedure-related complications, were collected. Histopathological findings of the biopsies were recorded and classified based on the degree to which they matched the clinical diagnosis and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) findings. A total of 212 EMBs obtained in 178 consecutive patients were retrospectively analyzed, with 42 biopsies performed for allograft rejection surveillance (10 patients) and the remaining performed for presumptive diagnosis of acute myocarditis or unexplained cardiomyopathy. Among the non-heart transplant cases, 54.7% of EMBs provided a clear diagnosis. The most common diagnosis was myocarditis (69%), followed by cardiac amyloidosis (CA) (26%). EMB was also helpful in detecting several rare cardiac conditions, such as eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), Fabry disease, and cardiac sarcoidosis. In a cohort of 101 patients who underwent both CMR and EMB, the results were concordant in 66% of cases. However, in 24.7% of patients, EMB was able to identify pathological conditions where CMR results were inconclusive, highlighting its complementary role in determining an accurate diagnosis. No complications were reported in any of the 212 EMBs performed. CONCLUSIONS: With advances in cardiac imaging modalities, EMB is not routinely indicated for the diagnosis of cardiomyopathy. However, EMB is still an important tool for diagnosing specific cardiac diseases and could be crucial for confirming the diagnosis. EMB is generally safe if performed at experienced centers.