Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic value of dual-source, dual-energy computed tomography combined with the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio for discriminating gastric signet ring cell from mixed signet ring cell and non-signet ring cell carcinomas.
Song, Qinxia; Wang, Xiangfa; Zhu, Juan; Shi, Hengfeng.
Afiliação
  • Song Q; Department of radiology, Anqing Municipal Hospital, Anqing, 246000, Anhui province, China.
  • Wang X; Department of radiology, Anqing Municipal Hospital, Anqing, 246000, Anhui province, China. Xiangfa.wang@aliyun.com.
  • Zhu J; Department of radiology, Anqing Municipal Hospital, Anqing, 246000, Anhui province, China.
  • Shi H; Department of radiology, Anqing Municipal Hospital, Anqing, 246000, Anhui province, China.
Abdom Radiol (NY) ; 49(9): 2996-3002, 2024 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38526596
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To explore the diagnostic value of dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for differentiating gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC) from mixed SRC (mSRC) and non-SRC (nSRC).

METHODS:

This retrospective study included patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent DSCT between August 2019 and June 2021 at our Hospital. The iodine concentration in the venous phase (ICvp), standardized iodine concentration (NICVP), and the slope of the energy spectrum curve (kVP) were extracted from DSCT data. NLR was determined from laboratory results. DSCT (including ICVP, NICVP, and kVP) and combination (including DSCT model and NLR) models were established based on the multinomial logistic regression analysis. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the diagnostic value.

RESULTS:

A total of 155 patients (SRC [n = 45, aged 61.22 ± 11.4 years], mSRC [n = 60, aged 61.09 ± 12.7 years], and nSRC [n = 50, aged 67.66 ± 8.76 years]) were included. There were significant differences in NLR, ICVP, NICVP, and kVP among the SRC, mSRC, and nSRC groups (all P < 0.001). The AUC of the combination model for SRC vs. mSRC + nSRC was 0.964 (95% CI 0.923-1.000), with a sensitivity of 98.3% and a specificity of 86.7%, higher than with DSCT (AUC 0.959, 95% CI 0.919-0.998, sensitivity 90.0%, specificity 89.9%) or NLR (AUC 0.670, 95% CI 0.577-0.768, sensitivity 62.2%, specificity 61.8%).

CONCLUSION:

DSCT combined with NLR showed high diagnostic efficacy in differentiating SRC from mSRC and nSRC.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Estomago Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Linfócitos / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Carcinoma de Células em Anel de Sinete / Neutrófilos Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Abdom Radiol (NY) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Estomago Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Linfócitos / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Carcinoma de Células em Anel de Sinete / Neutrófilos Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Abdom Radiol (NY) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China