Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Simultaneous Co-surgeon Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) Flap Breast Reconstructions: Feasibility and Clinical Outcomes.
Wang, Christine S; Al-Nowaylati, Abdl-Rawf; Matusko, Niki; Momoh, Adeyiza O; Kung, Theodore A.
Afiliação
  • Wang CS; Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Al-Nowaylati AR; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Matusko N; Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Momoh AO; Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Kung TA; Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. thekung@med.umich.edu.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 31(8): 5409-5416, 2024 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38619709
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

A co-surgeon model is known to be favorable in microvascular breast reconstruction, but simultaneous co-surgeon deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap cases have not been well-studied. The authors hypothesize that performing two simultaneous co-surgeon bilateral DIEP flap reconstructions results in non-inferior clinical outcomes and may improve patient access to care.

METHODS:

A single-institution, retrospective cohort study was performed utilizing record review to identify all cases of co-surgeon free-flap breast reconstructions over a 38-month period. Patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstructions with the same two co-surgeons were identified. The control group consisted of subjects who underwent non-simultaneous reconstruction by the same co-surgeons within the same, preceding, or following month of those in the study group. Primary outcome variables were 90-day postoperative complications, while secondary outcomes were operating time, ischemia time, and length of stay. Descriptive statistics, univariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS:

Overall, 137 subjects were identified and 64 met the inclusion criteria (n = 28 study, n = 36 control). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in body mass index, radiation, trainee experience, flap perforator number, immediate/delayed reconstruction, or length of stay. There were also no statistically significant differences in complications, including flap loss, anastomosis revision, take-back to the operating room, or re-admission. Operative time was longer in the simultaneous DIEP group (540.5 vs. 443.5 min, p < 0.01), but ischemia time was shorter in the simultaneous group (64.0 vs. 80.5 min, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS:

A simultaneous co-surgeon approach to bilateral DIEP flap reconstruction may improve access to care and does not result in a higher complication rate compared with non-simultaneous bilateral DIEP flaps.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Outros_tipos Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Neoplasias da Mama / Estudos de Viabilidade / Mamoplastia / Artérias Epigástricas / Retalho Perfurante Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Outros_tipos Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Neoplasias da Mama / Estudos de Viabilidade / Mamoplastia / Artérias Epigástricas / Retalho Perfurante Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos