Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Imaging of Peritoneal Metastases in Ovarian Cancer Using MDCT, MRI, and FDG PET/CT: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Tsili, Athina C; Alexiou, George; Tzoumpa, Martha; Siempis, Timoleon; Argyropoulou, Maria I.
Afiliação
  • Tsili AC; Department of Clinical Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, University Campus, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.
  • Alexiou G; Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, University Campus, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.
  • Tzoumpa M; Department of Clinical Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, University Campus, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.
  • Siempis T; ENT Department, Ulster Hospital, Upper Newtownards Rd., Dundonald, Belfast BT16 1RH, UK.
  • Argyropoulou MI; Department of Clinical Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, University Campus, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.
Cancers (Basel) ; 16(8)2024 Apr 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38672549
ABSTRACT
This review aims to compare the diagnostic performance of multidetector CT (MDCT), MRI, including diffusion-weighted imaging, and FDG PET/CT in the detection of peritoneal metastases (PMs) in ovarian cancer (OC). A comprehensive search was performed for articles published from 2000 to February 2023. The inclusion criteria were the following diagnosis/suspicion of PMs in patients with ovarian/fallopian/primary peritoneal cancer; initial staging or suspicion of recurrence; MDCT, MRI and/or FDG PET/CT performed for the detection of PMs; population of at least 10 patients; surgical results, histopathologic analysis, and/or radiologic follow-up, used as reference standard; and per-patient and per-region data and data for calculating sensitivity and specificity reported. In total, 33 studies were assessed, including 487 women with OC and PMs. On a per-patient basis, MRI (p = 0.03) and FDG PET/CT (p < 0.01) had higher sensitivity compared to MDCT. MRI and PET/CT had comparable sensitivities (p = 0.84). On a per-lesion analysis, no differences in sensitivity estimates were noted between MDCT and MRI (p = 0.25), MDCT and FDG PET/CT (p = 0.68), and MRI and FDG PET/CT (p = 0.35). Based on our results, FDG PET/CT and MRI are the preferred imaging modalities for the detection of PMs in OC. However, the value of FDG PET/CT and MRI compared to MDCT needs to be determined. Future research to address the limitations of the existing studies and the need for standardization and to explore the cost-effectiveness of the three imaging modalities is required.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Outros_tipos Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Grécia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Outros_tipos Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Grécia