Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Improving Operating Room Efficiency in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery: A Scoping Review.
Hathi, Kalpesh; Nam, You Sung Jon; Fowler, James; Dishan, Brad; Madou, Edward; Sowerby, Leigh J; MacNeil, S Danielle; Nichols, Anthony C; Strychowsky, Julie E.
Afiliação
  • Hathi K; Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
  • Nam YSJ; Dalhousie Medicine New Brunswick, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada.
  • Fowler J; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, Canada.
  • Dishan B; Corporate Academics, Health Sciences Library, London Health Sciences Center, London, Ontario, Canada.
  • Madou E; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, Canada.
  • Sowerby LJ; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, Canada.
  • MacNeil SD; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, Canada.
  • Nichols AC; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, Canada.
  • Strychowsky JE; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, Canada.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38769856
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

One minute of operating room (OR) time costs $36 to 37. However, ORs are notoriously inefficient. There is growing literature on improving OR efficiency, but no formal review of this topic within otolaryngology has been performed. This study reviews and synthesizes the current literature on improving OR efficiency within otolaryngology. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, preprints.org, and medRxiv were searched on November 4, 2022. REVIEW

METHODS:

Published English studies were included if they reported on metrics for improving OR efficiency within otolaryngology. There were no publication date restrictions. Articles were screened by 2 reviewers. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis reporting for scoping reviews was followed.

RESULTS:

The search yielded 9316 no-duplicate articles; 129 articles were included. Most of the studies reported on head and neck procedures (n = 52/129). The main tactics included surgical considerations hemostatic devices, techniques, and team/simultaneous approaches; anesthetic considerations local anesthetic and laryngeal mask airways; procedure location considerations procedures outside of the OR and remote technologies; standardization equipment, checklists, and personnel; scheduling considerations use of machine learning for booking, considering patient/surgeon factors, and utilizing dedicated OR time/multidisciplinary teams for on-call cases.

CONCLUSION:

The current literature brings to attention numerous strategies for improving OR efficiency within otolaryngology. Applying these strategies and implementing novel techniques to manage surgical cases may assist in offloading overloaded health care systems and improving access to care while facilitating patient safety and outcomes. Anticipated barriers to implementation include resistance to change, funding, and the current strain on health care systems and providers.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Assunto da revista: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Assunto da revista: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá