Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Working together with people with intellectual disability to make a difference: a protocol for a mixed-method co-production study to address inequities in cervical screening participation.
Bateson, Deborah; Ussher, Jane; Strnadová, Iva; Loblinzk, Julie; David, Michael; Chang, Ee-Lin; Carter, Allison; Sweeney, Sally; Winkler, Lauren; Power, Rosalie; Basckin, Caroline; Kennedy, Elizabeth; Jolly, Heather.
Afiliação
  • Bateson D; The Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Ussher J; Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Strnadová I; University of New South Wales, Faculty of Arts Design and Architecture, School of Education, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Loblinzk J; University of New South Wales, Disability Innovation Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • David M; Self Advocacy Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Chang EL; The Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Carter A; School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
  • Sweeney S; Family Planning Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Winkler L; Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Power R; Australian Human Rights Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Basckin C; Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
  • Kennedy E; Family Planning Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Jolly H; The Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1360447, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38846600
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Cervical cancer is one of the most preventable cancers yet remains a disease of inequity for people with intellectual disability, in part due to low screening rates. The ScreenEQUAL project will use an integrated knowledge translation (iKT) model to co-produce and evaluate accessible cervical screening resources with and for this group.

Methods:

Stage 1 will qualitatively explore facilitators and barriers to screening participation for people with intellectual disability, families and support people, healthcare providers and disability sector stakeholders (n ≈ 20 in each group). An accessible multimodal screening resource, accompanying supporting materials for families and support people, and trauma-informed healthcare provider training materials will then be co-produced through a series of workshops. Stage 2 will recruit people with intellectual disability aged 25 to 74 who are due or overdue for screening into a single-arm trial (n = 48). Trained support people will provide them with the co-produced resource in accessible workshops (intervention) and support them in completing pre-post questions to assess informed decision-making. A subset will participate in qualitative post-intervention interviews including optional body-mapping (n ≈ 20). Screening uptake in the 9-months following the intervention will be measured through data linkage. Family members and support people (n = 48) and healthcare providers (n = 433) will be recruited into single-arm sub-studies. Over a 4-month period they will, respectively, receive the accompanying supporting materials, and the trauma-informed training materials. Both groups will complete pre-post online surveys. A subset of each group (n ≈ 20) will be invited to participate in post-intervention semi-structured interviews. Outcomes and

analysis:

Our primary outcome is a change in informed decision-making by people with intellectual disability across the domains of knowledge, attitudes, and screening intention. Secondary outcomes include (i) uptake of screening in the 9-months following the intervention workshops, (ii) changes in health literacy, attitudes and self-efficacy of family members and support people, and (iii) changes in knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy and preparedness of screening providers. Each participant group will evaluate acceptability, feasibility and usability of the resources.

Discussion:

If found to be effective and acceptable, the co-produced cervical screening resources and training materials will be made freely available through the ScreenEQUAL website to support national, and potentially international, scale-up.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Saude_da_mulher / Colo_do_utero / Tipos_de_cancer / Colo_do_utero / Outros_tipos Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Colo do Útero / Detecção Precoce de Câncer / Deficiência Intelectual Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Front Public Health Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Saude_da_mulher / Colo_do_utero / Tipos_de_cancer / Colo_do_utero / Outros_tipos Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Colo do Útero / Detecção Precoce de Câncer / Deficiência Intelectual Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Front Public Health Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália