Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Three-year outcomes of surgical valve replacement with Dafodil™ pericardial bioprosthesis: Dafodil™-1 trial.
Hiremath, Channabasavaraj Shivalingaiah; Jain, Anil R; Garg, Anurag; Maslekar, Atul A; Gupta, Nirmal K; Sarkar, Binay Krishna; Bhat, Seetharama; Porwal, Manish; Meharwal, Zile Singh; Mishra, Yugal Kishore; Vaijyanath, Prashanth; Grover, Vijay; Chaudhary, Shiv Kumar; Rajput, Subash S; Sethuratnam, Rajan; Shastri, Naman.
Afiliação
  • Hiremath CS; Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Sri Madhusudan Sai Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Sri Sathya Sai Sanjeevani Group of Hospitals, Sathya Sai Grama Muddenahalli, Chikkaballapura, India.
  • Jain AR; Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, EPIC Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.
  • Garg A; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Dr D. Y. Patil Medical College & Hospital, Pune, India.
  • Maslekar AA; Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Narayana Multispeciality Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.
  • Gupta NK; Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.
  • Sarkar BK; Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Nil Ratan Sircar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, India.
  • Bhat S; Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences & Research, Bangalore, India.
  • Porwal M; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Convenient Hospitals Limited, Indore, India.
  • Meharwal ZS; Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Fortis Escorts Heart Institute, New Delhi, India.
  • Mishra YK; Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Manipal Hospital, New Delhi, India.
  • Vaijyanath P; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Kovai Medical College and Hospital, Coimbatore, India.
  • Grover V; Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India.
  • Chaudhary SK; Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
  • Rajput SS; Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, Lucknow, India.
  • Sethuratnam R; Department of Cardiac Surgery, Madras Medical Mission, Chennai, India.
  • Shastri N; Department of Cardiac Anaesthesiology, EPIC Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.
Front Cardiovasc Med ; 11: 1393762, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38873269
ABSTRACT

Background:

The Dafodil™-1 trial was designed to evaluate the clinical safety and performance of Dafodil™ pericardial bioprosthesis for replacing diseased native or prosthetic aortic or mitral valves in patients with advanced valvular heart disease (VHD).

Methods:

The Dafodil™-1 trial was a prospective, multicenter, first-in-human clinical trial. Patients were enrolled if they had advanced VHD requiring aortic valve replacement (AVR) or mitral valve replacement (MVR) with or without concomitant valve surgery and having surgical risk scores <4%. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke; and hemodynamics were analyzed.

Results:

A total of 136 patients (aortic 67 and mitral 69) were enrolled in the trial (with mean age-AVR group 60.2 ± 8.3 years and MVR group 49.7 ± 14.4 years). A total of 134 patients (aortic 66 and mitral 68) completed the 3-year follow-up (total 300 per 100 patient-years of follow-up). The AVR group demonstrated a significant reduction in the mean pressure gradients from 51.2 ± 24.1 mmHg at baseline to 11.1 ± 6.0 mmHg at the 3-year follow-up (p < 0.0001). The mean effective orifice area (EOA) improved from baseline (0.9 ± 0.6 cm2) to 3-year follow-up (1.8 ± 0.4 cm2) (p < 0.0001). In the MVR group, the mean indexed EOA (iEOA) increased significantly from baseline (0.7 ± 0.4 cm2/m2) to 3-year follow-up (1.1 ± 0.4 cm2/m2) (p < 0.001). There was significant improvement in New York Heart Association functional class and mean SF-12 scores in both groups. At 3-year follow-up, the MACE incidence was 2.3% per 100 patient-years (1.3% strokes per 100 patient-years and 1.3% deaths per 100 patient-years) for AVR group and 4.7% per 100 patient-years (0.6% strokes per 100 patient-years and 4.0% deaths per 100 patient-years) for MVR group. No cases of MI, structural valve deterioration and prosthetic valve endocarditis were reported. The AVR and MVR groups achieved 89.6% and 79.7% MACE-free survival, respectively at 3-year follow-up.

Conclusions:

The Dafodil™-1 trial demonstrated satisfactory outcomes of clinical safety, hemodynamic performance, and quality-of-life metrics. Additionally, no incidence of structural valve deterioration and very low rates of valve thrombosis during the 3-year follow-up period of Dafodil™-1 first-in-human trial indicated acceptable valve durability up to three years and similar outcomes are warranted for longer follow-ups as a primary goal. Clinical Trial Registration Number https//www.ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/showallp.php?mid1=18377&EncHid=&userName=CTRI/2017/07/009008, CTRI/2017/07/009008.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Cardiovasc Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Índia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Cardiovasc Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Índia