Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Time is NTCP: Should we maximize patient throughput or perform online adaptation on proton therapy systems?
Borderías-Villarroel, E; Barragán-Montero, A; Sterpin, E.
Afiliação
  • Borderías-Villarroel E; UCLouvain, Institut de recherche expérimentale et clinique, Molecular Imaging and Radiation Oncology (MIRO) Laboratory, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Barragán-Montero A; UCLouvain, Institut de recherche expérimentale et clinique, Molecular Imaging and Radiation Oncology (MIRO) Laboratory, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Sterpin E; UCLouvain, Institut de recherche expérimentale et clinique, Molecular Imaging and Radiation Oncology (MIRO) Laboratory, Brussels, Belgium; KU Leuven, Department of Oncology, Laboratory of external radiotherapy, Leuven, Belgium; Particle Therapy Interuniversity Center Leuven - PARTICLE, Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: edmond.sterpin@uclouvain.be.
Radiother Oncol ; 198: 110389, 2024 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38885906
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Compared to conventional radiotherapy (XT), proton therapy (PT) may improve normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP). However, PT typically requires higher adaptation rates due to an increased sensitivity to anatomical changes. Systematic online adaptation may address this issue, but it requires additional replanning time, decreasing patient throughput. Therefore, less patients would benefit in such case from PT for a given machine capacity, with results in worse NTCP.

AIM:

To investigate the trade-off between PT patient throughput and NTCP gain as a function of the time needed for adaptation.

METHODS:

A retrospective database of 14 lung patients with two repeated 4DCTs was used to compare NTCP values between XT and PT for NTCP2ym (2-year mortality), NTCPdysphagia and NTCPpneumonitis. Four scenarios were considered for PT no adaptation using clinical robustness parameters (4D robust optimization, 3 % range error and PTV-equivalent setup errors); systematic online adaptation with clinical robustness parameters; setup errors reduced to 4 mm and to 2 mm. Dose was accumulated on the planning CT. The number of patients treated with PT depended on the extra time needed for adaptation, assuming an 8-hours capacity (assuming 14 patients a day; thus minimum 34.2 min per treatment session if there is no or instantaneous adaptation).

RESULTS:

Baseline NTCP gains (PT against XT without adaptation) equaled 6.9 %, 6.1 %, and 7.7 % for NTCP2ym, NTCPdysphagia and NTCPpneumonitis, respectively. Using instantaneous online adaptation and setup errors of 2 mm, the overall gains were then 10.7 %, 13.6 % and 12.4 %. Taking into account loss of capacity, 13.7 min was the maximum extra-time allowed to complete adaptation and maintain an advantage on all three metrics for the 2-mm setup error scenario.

CONCLUSION:

This study highlights the critical importance of keeping short online adaptation times when using systems with limited capacity like PT.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Pulmao Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador / Terapia com Prótons / Neoplasias Pulmonares Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Radiother Oncol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Pulmao Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador / Terapia com Prótons / Neoplasias Pulmonares Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Radiother Oncol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica