Psychometric validation of the Chinese versions of the quality of communication questionnaires for cancer patients and their family caregivers.
BMC Nurs
; 23(1): 413, 2024 Jun 20.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38898521
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
Given the lack of valid and reliable instruments for evaluating the quality of communication between physicians and cancer patients and their family caregivers in China, this study translated and culturally adapted the Quality of Communication questionnaires for cancer patients (QOC-P) and their family caregivers (QOC-F) for use in the Chinese context and evaluated their psychometric properties.METHODS:
The QOC-P and QOC-F were translated following an adapted version of Brislin's translation model and culturally adapted according to a Delphi expert panel. We pretested and refined the Chinese versions of the QOC-P and QOC-F among 16 dyads of patients and their family caregivers. Subsequently, we administered the questionnaires to 228 dyads of patients and their family caregivers who were recruited from six tertiary hospitals. The content validity, construct validity, convergent validity, and reliability of the QOC-P and QOC-F were examined.RESULTS:
Through exploratory factor analysis, The QOC-P and QOC-F were divided into two dimensions general communication and end-of-life communication. The Cronbach's coefficients ranged from 0.905 to 0.907 for the two subscales of the QOC-P and from 0.908 to 0.953 for the two subscales of the QOC-F. The two-week test-retest reliability was acceptable for both the QOC-P and QOC-F, with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.993 and 0.991, respectively. The scale content validity index (QOC-P 0.857, QOC-F 1.0) and split-half reliability (QOC-P 0.833, QOC-F 0.935) were satisfactory. There was a negative correlation with anxiety and depression for both the QOC-P (r = -0.233 & -0.241, p < 0.001) and QOC-F (r = -0.464 & -0.420, p<0.001). The QOC-P showed a negative correlation with decision regret (r = -0.445, p<0.001) and a positive correlation with shared decision-making (r = 0.525, p<0.001), as hypothesized.CONCLUSION:
The QOC-P and QOC-F show acceptable psychometric properties for evaluating the quality of communication between physicians and cancer patients and their family caregivers in both clinical and research contexts. Future studies should use more diverse and inclusive samples to test the structure of the Chinese version of the QOC-P and QOC-F with confirmatory factor analysis.
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Temas:
Cuidados_paliativos
/
Geral
/
Tipos_de_cancer
/
Outros_tipos
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Idioma:
En
Revista:
BMC Nurs
Ano de publicação:
2024
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
China