Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What is the economic and social return on investment for telephone cancer information and support services in Australia? An evaluative social return on investment study protocol.
McCaffrey, Nikki; White, Victoria; Engel, Lidia; Mihalopoulos, Cathrine; Orellana, Liliana; Livingston, Patricia M; Paul, Christine L; Aranda, Sanchia; De Silva, Daswin; Bucholc, Jessica; Hutchinson, Alison M; Steiner, Anna; Ratcliffe, Julie; Lane, Katherine; Spence, Danielle; Harper, Todd; Livingstone, Ann; Fradgley, Elizabeth; Hutchinson, Claire Louise.
Afiliação
  • McCaffrey N; Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University Faculty of Health, Burwood, Victoria, Australia nikki.mccaffrey@deakin.edu.au.
  • White V; School of Psychology, Deakin University Faculty of Health, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
  • Engel L; Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
  • Mihalopoulos C; Monash University Health Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
  • Orellana L; Biostatistics Unit, Deakin University Faculty of Health, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
  • Livingston PM; Deakin University Faculty of Health, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
  • Paul CL; School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Aranda S; Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.
  • De Silva D; Department of Nursing, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Bucholc J; Centre for Data Analytics and Cognition, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
  • Hutchinson AM; Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University Faculty of Health, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
  • Steiner A; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University Faculty of Health, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
  • Ratcliffe J; Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
  • Lane K; Consumer Engagement, Cancer Council Victoria, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Spence D; Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Harper T; MediStays, South Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Livingstone A; Strategy & Support, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Fradgley E; Cancer Council Victoria, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Hutchinson CL; Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University Faculty of Health, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
BMJ Open ; 14(6): e081425, 2024 Jun 25.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38925706
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Over 50% of people affected by cancer report unmet support needs. To address unmet information and psychological needs, non-government organisations such as Cancer Councils (Australia) have developed state-based telephone cancer information and support services. Due to competing demands, evidence of the value of these services is needed to ensure that future investment makes the best use of scarce resources. This research aims to determine the costs and broader economic and social value of a telephone support service, to inform future funding and service provision. METHODS AND

ANALYSIS:

A codesigned, evaluative social return on investment analysis (SROI) will be conducted to estimate and compare the costs and monetised benefits of Cancer Council Victoria's (CCV) telephone support line, 13 11 20, over 1-year and 3-year benefit periods. Nine studies will empirically estimate the parameters to inform the SROI and calculate the ratio (economic and social value to value invested) step 1 mapping outcomes (in-depth analysis of CCV's 13 11 20 recorded call data; focus groups and interviews); step 2 providing evidence of outcomes (comparative survey of people affected by cancer who do and do not call CCV's 13 11 20; general public survey); step 3 valuing the outcomes (financial proxies, value games); step 4 establishing the impact (Delphi); step 5 calculating the net benefit and step 6 service improvement (discrete choice experiment (DCE), 'what if' analysis). Qualitative (focus groups, interviews) and quantitative studies (natural language processing, cross-sectional studies, Delphi) and economic techniques (willingness-to-pay, financial proxies, value games, DCE) will be applied. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval for each of the studies will be sought independently as the project progresses. So far, ethics approval has been granted for the first two studies. As each study analysis is completed, results will be disseminated through presentation, conferences, publications and reports to the partner organisations.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Cuidados_paliativos / Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Outros_tipos Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Análise Custo-Benefício / Neoplasias Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Cuidados_paliativos / Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Outros_tipos Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Análise Custo-Benefício / Neoplasias Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália