Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
En Bloc Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation Compared to the Traditional Technique: Results From a Single Center.
Marin-Castro, Pedro; Waisberg, Daniel Reis; Rocha-Santos, Vinicius; Pinheiro, Rafael Soares; Martino, Rodrigo Bronze; Ducatti, Liliana; Arantes, Rubens Macedo; Santos, Joao Paulo; Alvarez, Paola Espinoza; Lee, Andre Dong; Haddad, Luciana Bertocco; Song, Alice Tung; Vieira, Igor Ferreira; Alvarez, Jhosimar; Silva, Maciana Santos; Almeida, Juliani Dourado; Galvão, Flávio Henrique; Piovesan, Affonso Celso; Carneiro-D Albuquerque, Luiz Augusto; Andraus, Wellington.
Afiliação
  • Marin-Castro P; Liver and Abdominal Organs Transplantation Division, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de São Paulo (HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Waisberg DR; Liver and Abdominal Organs Transplantation Division, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de São Paulo (HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: daniel.waisberg@hc.fm.usp.br.
  • Rocha-Santos V; Liver and Abdominal Organs Transplantation Division, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de São Paulo (HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Pinheiro RS; Liver and Abdominal Organs Transplantation Division, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de São Paulo (HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Martino RB; Liver and Abdominal Organs Transplantation Division, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de São Paulo (HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Ducatti L; Liver and Abdominal Organs Transplantation Division, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de São Paulo (HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Arantes RM; Liver and Abdominal Organs Transplantation Division, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de São Paulo (HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Santos JP; Liver and Abdominal Organs Transplantation Division, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de São Paulo (HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Alvarez PE; Liver and Abdominal Organs Transplantation Division, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de São Paulo (HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Lee AD; Liver and Abdominal Organs Transplantation Division, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de São Paulo (HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Haddad LB; Liver and Abdominal Organs Transplantation Division, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de São Paulo (HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil; Laboratory of Medical Investigation 37 (LIM-37), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), Sao Paulo, Braz
  • Song AT; Liver and Abdominal Organs Transplantation Division, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de São Paulo (HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Vieira IF; Liver and Abdominal Organs Transplantation Division, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de São Paulo (HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Alvarez J; Liver and Abdominal Organs Transplantation Division, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de São Paulo (HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Silva MS; Liver and Abdominal Organs Transplantation Division, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de São Paulo (HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Almeida JD; Liver and Abdominal Organs Transplantation Division, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de São Paulo (HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Galvão FH; Liver and Abdominal Organs Transplantation Division, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de São Paulo (HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil; Laboratory of Medical Investigation 37 (LIM-37), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), Sao Paulo, Braz
  • Piovesan AC; Renal Transplantation Unit, Department of Urology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de São Paulo (HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Carneiro-D Albuquerque LA; Liver and Abdominal Organs Transplantation Division, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de São Paulo (HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil; Laboratory of Medical Investigation 37 (LIM-37), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), Sao Paulo, Braz
  • Andraus W; Liver and Abdominal Organs Transplantation Division, Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de São Paulo (HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil; Laboratory of Medical Investigation 37 (LIM-37), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), Sao Paulo, Braz
Transplant Proc ; 56(5): 1104-1109, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39048477
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation is indicated for patients with concomitant end-stage liver disease and end-stage renal disease. The traditional technique involves separate implantations of the liver and the kidney. In the en bloc approach, the liver is recovered en bloc with the right kidney and the donor renal artery is anastomosed to the donor splenic artery. We aimed to compare the outcomes of the traditional and en bloc techniques for simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation in a single center.

METHODS:

This single-center retrospective study involved all adult patients who underwent simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation from brain-dead donors from January 2017 to December 2022.

RESULTS:

A total of 15 patients were included 10 transplanted with the traditional technique and 5 with the en bloc approach. Patients in the en bloc group presented higher body mass index, shorter kidney cold and total ischemia times, shorter overall surgical time and longer kidney warm ischemia time (29.07 kg/m2vs 23.20 kg/m2 [P = .048]; 560 minutes vs 880 minutes [P = .026]; 615 minutes vs 908 minutes [P = 0.025]; 405 minutes vs 485 minutes [P = .046]; 46 minutes vs 33.5 minutes [P = 0.027], respectively). Ureteroneocystostomy was performed in 2 patients of the en bloc group and ureteroureterostomy in the remaining 3 patients. One patient in the en bloc group presented stenosis of renal artery anastomosis and underwent percutaneous angioplasty. This same patient eventually developed late urinary fistula. In the traditional technique group, there were 2 cases of renal vein thrombosis and 1 of ureteral stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS:

Compared with the traditional technique, the en bloc approach is feasible and safe, reducing kidney total ischemia time and overall surgical time.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Rim / Transplante de Fígado Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Transplant Proc Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Rim / Transplante de Fígado Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Transplant Proc Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil