Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Single bladder instillation of gemcitabine versus mitomycin C after minimally invasive radical nephroureterectomy: A propensity-score match analysis from the ROBUUST 2.0 collaborative group.
Bologna, Eugenio; Wu, Zhenjie; Franco, Antonio; Abdollah, Firas; Finati, Marco; Simone, Giuseppe; Tuderti, Gabriele; Licari, Leslie Claire; Correa, Andres F; Lee, Randall; De Cobelli, Ottavio; Ferro, Matteo; Porpiglia, Francesco; Amparore, Daniele; Checcucci, Enrico; Tufano, Antonio; Perdonà, Sisto; Bhanvadia, Raj; Margulis, Vitaly; Brönimann, Stephan; Singla, Nirmish; Puri, Dhruv; Derweesh, Ithaar H; Mendiola, Dinno F; Gonzalgo, Mark L; Ben-David, Reuben; Mehrazin, Reza; Moon, Sol C; Rais-Bahrami, Soroush; Yong, Courtney; Sundaram, Chandru P; Ghoreifi, Alireza; Moghaddam, Farshad S; Djaladat, Hooman; Ditonno, Francesco; Antonelli, Alessandro; Autorino, Riccardo.
Afiliação
  • Bologna E; Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Wu Z; Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
  • Franco A; Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
  • Abdollah F; Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Finati M; Department of Urology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
  • Simone G; Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
  • Tuderti G; Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
  • Licari LC; Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
  • Correa AF; Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
  • Lee R; Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • De Cobelli O; Department of Urology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
  • Ferro M; Fox Chase-Temple Urologic Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Porpiglia F; Fox Chase-Temple Urologic Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Amparore D; Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology-IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
  • Checcucci E; Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology-IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
  • Tufano A; Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy.
  • Perdonà S; Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
  • Bhanvadia R; Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Turin, Italy.
  • Margulis V; Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
  • Brönimann S; Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy.
  • Singla N; Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy.
  • Puri D; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Derweesh IH; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Mendiola DF; Brady Urological Institute, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Gonzalgo ML; Brady Urological Institute, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Ben-David R; Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA.
  • Mehrazin R; Department of Urology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA.
  • Moon SC; Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
  • Rais-Bahrami S; Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
  • Yong C; Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
  • Sundaram CP; Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
  • Ghoreifi A; Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Moghaddam FS; Department of Urology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Djaladat H; Department of Urology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Ditonno F; Department of Urology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Antonelli A; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Autorino R; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Asian J Urol ; 12(2): 250-257, 2025 Apr.
Article em En | PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ID: mdl-40458573
Objective: Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is considered the standard of care for patients with high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Current literature reveals a deficit in direct comparative studies evaluating the efficacy of different chemotherapeutic agents administered in single postoperative instillation following RNU. The primary aim of this study was to compare the bladder recurrence (BR) rates between patients receiving a single instillation of mitomycin C (MMC) versus gemcitabine (Gem) after RNU. Methods: The ROBUUST (ROBotic surgery for Upper tract Urothelial cancer STudy) 2.0 is an international, multicenter registry that aggregates data on patients who have undergone curative surgery for upper tract urothelial carcinoma across participating centers from January 2015 to December 2022. Data including primary baseline variables of the patients, characteristics of the tumors, surgical management, and definitive histopathological characterizations were collected and stratified based on the type of postoperative bladder instillation: MMC (the MMC group) and Gem (the Gem group). We selected variables correlated with our primary outcome to conduct a propensity-score match analysis. Results: One hundred patients in the MMC group were matched 1:1 with 100 patients in the Gem group. At 36 months of follow-up, 30 patients in the MMC group and 39 patients in the Gem group experienced BR, representing recurrence rates of 30% and 39%, respectively (p=0.2). The Cox proportional hazards model comparing BR between the groups revealed a hazard ratio of 1.58 (95% confidence interval: 0.98-2.55) with a non-statistically significant increased risk of BR in the Gem group compared with the MMC group (p=0.059). Conclusion: A single perioperative instillation of Gem or MMC seems to offer similar efficacy in reducing the risk of BR in patients undergoing RNU. Further research, ideally within the framework of prospective studies, is warranted to elucidate the optimal chemotherapeutic approach in this setting.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Asian j urol Ano de publicação: 2025 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Asian j urol Ano de publicação: 2025 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos