Innovative approaches to investigator-initiated, multicentre paediatric clinical trials in Canada.

Data from clinical trials are needed to guide the safe and effective use of medicines in children. Clinical trials are challenging to design and implement in all populations, and children present additional considerations. Several regions including the UK, USA and Europe have established clinical trial infrastructure to capitalise on expertise and promote clinical trials enrolling children. Our objective is to describe the partnerships and operational considerations for the development of paediatric clinical trials infrastructure in Canada. We describe the design and conduct of four emergency room paediatric trials, with four separate sponsors, across four provinces in parallel. Operations discussed include multisite contract development, centralised risk-based data monitoring, ethical review and patient engagement. We conclude with lessons learnt, additional challenges and potential solutions to facilitate drug development for children in Canada.

Randomized controlled trials in pediatric patients had higher completion rates than adult trials: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: Conduct of clinical trials is perceived to be more challenging in children than in adults. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the age of participants on completion rates of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A cross-sectional study on RCTs registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database. All RCTs registered up to December 31, 2016, were extracted and were classified according to their recruitment status: active, completed, or discontinued and according to the age of participants: children (<17 years), adults (≥18 years), and mixed-age population. A logistic regression model was applied to assess the impact of participant's age category on trial completion while controlling for other relevant trial features. RESULTS: A total of 65,095 registered RCTs were identified. Among pediatric trials, 49.9% were completed and 8.5% were discontinued. Among adult and mixed age RCTs, respectively, 49.7% and 47.9% were completed whereas, 10.2% and 9.4% were discontinued. Overall, pediatric and mixed age RCTs were more likely to be registered as completed than adult RCTs (odds ratio: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.02-1.30; odds ratio: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.04-1.27, respectively). Also, funding source, type of intervention under evaluation, primary trial purpose, use of a blinding procedure, use of a placebo, and participants' assignment model were identified as independent predictors of RCT completion. CONCLUSION: Contrary to current perceptions and despite several specific challenges, recruitment of children and adolescents is not a limiting factor to completing a RCT. Other study features such as funding source, impact completeness and should be carefully considered before initiating research.

Assessment of pediatric asthma drug use in three European countries; a TEDDY study.

UNLABELLED: Asthma drugs are amongst the most frequently used drugs in childhood, but international comparisons on type and indication of use are lacking. The aim of this study was to describe asthma drug use in children with and without asthma in the Netherlands (NL), Italy (IT), and the United Kingdom (UK). We conducted a retrospective analysis of outpatient medical records of children 0-18 years from 1 January 2000 until 31 December 2005. For all children, prescription rates of asthma drugs were studied by country, age, asthma diagnosis, and off-label status. One-year prevalence rates were calculated per 100 children per patient-year (PY). The cohort consisted of 671,831 children of whom 49,442 had been diagnosed with asthma at any time during follow-up. ß2-mimetics and inhaled steroids were the most frequently prescribed asthma drug classes in NL (4.9 and 4.1/100 PY), the UK (8.7 and 5.3/100 PY) and IT (7.2 and 16.2/100 PY), respectively. Xanthines, anticholinergics, leukotriene receptor antagonists, and anti-allergics were prescribed in less than one child per 100 per year. In patients without asthma, ß2-mimetics were used most frequently. Country differences were highest for steroids, (Italy highest), and for ß2-mimetics (the UK highest). Off-label use was low, and most pronounced for ß2-mimetics in children <18 months (IT) and combined ß2-mimetics + anticholinergics in children <6 years (NL). CONCLUSION: This study shows that among all asthma drugs, ß2-mimetics and inhaled steroids are most often used, also in children without asthma, and with large variability between countries. Linking multi-country databases allows us to study country specific pediatric drug use in a systematic manner without being hampered by methodological differences. This study underlines the potency of healthcare databases in rapidly providing data on pediatric drug use and possibly safety.

Determinants for drug prescribing to children below the minimum licensed age.

OBJECTIVES: In the light of the undesired effects that unlicensed and off-label drug use might have, it is necessary to study the determinants affecting the prescribing of such drugs. Prescription of drugs to children younger than the minimum licensed age may carry the highest risk of adverse reactions. To obtain insight into the factors that affect prescription of drugs to children below the minimum licensed age, we conducted a population-based case-control study. METHODS: The case-control study was nested in a cohort of 13,426 children aged 0-16 years, who were registered in the Integrated Primary Care Information (IPCI) project, a longitudinal observational general practitioners' database in the Netherlands. "Cases" were children who received a drug prescription for which they were below the minimum licensed age. To each case we matched up to four controls based on GP practice and patient age. As potential risk factors we evaluated the use of health care resources, and acute and chronic morbidity. RESULTS: We identified 447 cases who were matched to 1355 controls. The cases consulted their GPs significantly more often during the preceding half year, had more drug prescriptions, and had more specialist referrals than the controls. Respiratory diseases were the most important determinants for the prescription of drugs to children below the minimum licensed age. In adolescents, migraine and other headaches were the most important reasons. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that children suffering from respiratory disease or migraine have the highest risk of receiving a drug prescription for which the patient is below the minimum licensed age. Regulatory authorities and the pharmaceutical industry should be stimulated to improve the evaluation of drug efficacy and safety in children.