Intraoperative in vivo confocal endomicroscopy of the glioma margin: performance assessment of image interpretation by neurosurgeon users.

Objectives: Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) is an intraoperative real-time cellular resolution imaging technology that images brain tumor histoarchitecture. Previously, we demonstrated that CLE images may be interpreted by neuropathologists to determine the presence of tumor infiltration at glioma margins. In this study, we assessed neurosurgeons' ability to interpret CLE images from glioma margins and compared their assessments to those of neuropathologists. Methods: In vivo CLE images acquired at the glioma margins that were previously reviewed by CLE-experienced neuropathologists were interpreted by four CLE-experienced neurosurgeons. A numerical scoring system from 0 to 5 and a dichotomous scoring system based on pathological features were used. Scores from assessments of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections and CLE images by neuropathologists from a previous study were used for comparison. Neurosurgeons' scores were compared to the H&E findings. The inter-rater agreement and diagnostic performance based on neurosurgeons' scores were calculated. The concordance between dichotomous and numerical scores was determined. Results: In all, 4275 images from 56 glioma margin regions of interest (ROIs) were included in the analysis. With the numerical scoring system, the inter-rater agreement for neurosurgeons interpreting CLE images was moderate for all ROIs (mean agreement, 61%), which was significantly better than the inter-rater agreement for the neuropathologists (mean agreement, 48%) (p < 0.01). The inter-rater agreement for neurosurgeons using the dichotomous scoring system was 83%. The concordance between the numerical and dichotomous scoring systems was 93%. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 78%, 32%, 62%, and 50%, respectively, using the numerical scoring system and 80%, 27%, 61%, and 48%, respectively, using the dichotomous scoring system. No statistically significant differences in diagnostic performance were found between the neurosurgeons and neuropathologists. Conclusion: Neurosurgeons' performance in interpreting CLE images was comparable to that of neuropathologists. These results suggest that CLE could be used as an intraoperative guidance tool with neurosurgeons interpreting the images with or without assistance of the neuropathologists. The dichotomous scoring system is robust yet simple and may streamline rapid, simultaneous interpretation of CLE images during imaging.

Toward an optimal cadaveric brain model for neurosurgical education: assessment of preservation, parenchyma, vascular injection, and imaging.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed types of cadaveric head and brain tissue specimen preparations that are used in a high throughput neurosurgical research laboratory to determine optimal preparation methods for neurosurgical anatomical research, education, and training. METHODS: Cadaveric specimens (N = 112) prepared using different preservation and vascular injection methods were imaged, dissected, and graded by 11 neurosurgeons using a 21-point scale. We assessed the quality of tissue and preservation in both the anterior and posterior circulations. Tissue quality was evaluated using a 9-point magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scale. RESULTS: Formalin-fixed specimens yielded the highest scores for assessment (mean ± SD [17.0 ± 2.8]) vs. formalin-flushed (17.0 ± 3.6) and MRI (6.9 ± 2.0). Cadaver assessment and MRI scores were positively correlated (P < 0.001, R2 0.60). Analysis showed significant associations between cadaver assessment scores and specific variables: nonformalin fixation (ß = -3.3), preservation within ≤72 h of death (ß = 1.8), and MRI quality score (ß = 0.7). Formalin-fixed specimens exhibited greater hardness than formalin-flushed and nonformalin-fixed specimens (P ≤ 0.006). Neurosurgeons preferred formalin-flushed specimens injected with colored latex. CONCLUSION: For better-quality specimens for neurosurgical education and training, formalin preservation within ≤72 h of death was preferable, as was injection with colored latex. Formalin-flushed specimens more closely resembled live brain parenchyma. Assessment scores were lower for preparation techniques performed > 72 h postmortem and for nonformalin preservation solutions. The positive correlation between cadaver assessment scores and our novel MRI score indicates that donation organizations and institutional buyers should incorporate MRI as a screening tool for the selection of high-quality specimens.

Seven bypasses simulation set: description and validity assessment of novel models for microneurosurgical training.

OBJECTIVE: Microsurgical training remains indispensable to master cerebrovascular bypass procedures, but simulation models for training that accurately replicate microanastomosis in narrow, deep-operating corridors are lacking. Seven simulation bypass scenarios were developed that included head models in various surgical positions with premade approaches, simulating the restrictions of the surgical corridors and hand positions for microvascular bypass training. This study describes these models and assesses their validity. METHODS: Simulation models were created using 3D printing of the skull with a designed craniotomy. Brain and external soft tissues were cast using a silicone molding technique from the clay-sculptured prototypes. The 7 simulation scenarios included: 1) temporal craniotomy for a superficial temporal artery (STA)-middle cerebral artery (MCA) bypass using the M4 branch of the MCA; 2) pterional craniotomy and transsylvian approach for STA-M2 bypass; 3) bifrontal craniotomy and interhemispheric approach for side-to-side bypass using the A3 branches of the anterior cerebral artery; 4) far lateral craniotomy and transcerebellomedullary approach for a posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA)-PICA bypass or 5) PICA reanastomosis; 6) orbitozygomatic craniotomy and transsylvian-subtemporal approach for a posterior cerebral artery bypass; and 7) extended retrosigmoid craniotomy and transcerebellopontine approach for an occipital artery-anterior inferior cerebellar artery bypass. Experienced neurosurgeons evaluated each model by practicing the aforementioned bypasses on the models. Face and content validities were assessed using the bypass participant survey. RESULTS: A workflow for model production was developed, and these models were used during microsurgical courses at 2 neurosurgical institutions. Each model is accompanied by a corresponding prototypical case and surgical video, creating a simulation scenario. Seven experienced cerebrovascular neurosurgeons practiced microvascular anastomoses on each of the models and completed surveys. They reported that actual anastomosis within a specific approach was well replicated by the models, and difficulty was comparable to that for real surgery, which confirms the face validity of the models. All experts stated that practice using these models may improve bypass technique, instrument handling, and surgical technique when applied to patients, confirming the content validity of the models. CONCLUSIONS: The 7 bypasses simulation set includes novel models that effectively simulate surgical scenarios of a bypass within distinct deep anatomical corridors, as well as hand and operator positions. These models use artificial materials, are reusable, and can be implemented for personal training and during microsurgical courses.

Volumetric 3-Dimensional Analysis of the Supraorbital vs Pterional Approach to Paramedian Vascular Structures: Comprehensive Assessment of Surgical Maneuverability.

BACKGROUND: Both the pterional and supraorbital approaches have been proposed as optimal access corridors to deep and paramedian anatomy. OBJECTIVE: To assess key intracranial structures accessed through the surgical approaches using the angle of attack (AOA) and the volume of surgical freedom (VSF) methodologies. METHODS: Ten pterional and 10 supraorbital craniotomies were completed. Data points were measured using a neuronavigation system. A comparative analysis of the craniocaudal AOA, mediolateral AOA, and VSF of the ipsilateral paraclinoid internal carotid artery (ICA), terminal ICA, and anterior communicating artery (ACoA) complex was completed. RESULTS: For the paraclinoid ICA, the pterional approach produced larger craniocaudal AOA, mediolateral AOA, and VSF than the supraorbital approach (28.06° vs 10.52°, 33.76° vs 23.95°, and 68.73 vs 22.59 mm3 normalized unit [NU], respectively; P < .001). The terminal ICA showed similar superiority of the pterional approach in all quantitative parameters (27.43° vs 11.65°, 30.62° vs 25.31°, and 57.41 vs 17.36 mm3 NU; P < .05). For the ACoA, there were statistically significant differences between the results obtained using the pterional and supraorbital approaches (18.45° vs 10.11°, 29.68° vs 21.01°, and 26.81 vs 16.53 mm3 NU; P < .005). CONCLUSION: The pterional craniotomy was significantly superior in all instrument maneuverability parameters for approaching the ipsilateral paraclinoid ICA, terminal ICA, and ACoA. This global evaluation of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional surgical freedom and instrument maneuverability by amalgamating the craniocaudal AOA, mediolateral AOA, and VSF produces a comprehensive assessment while generating spatially and anatomically accurate corridor models that provide improved visual depiction for preoperative planning and surgical decision-making.

Comparative Anatomical Assessment of Full vs Limited Transcavernous Exposure of the Carotid-Oculomotor Window.

BACKGROUND: Although the full transcavernous approach affords extensive mobilization of the oculomotor nerve (OMN) for exposure of the basilar apex and interpeduncular cistern region, this time-consuming procedure requires substantial dural dissection along the anterior middle cranial fossa. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the extent to which limited middle fossa dural elevation affects the carotid-oculomotor window (C-OMW) surgical area during transcavernous exposure after OMN mobilization. METHODS: Four cadaveric specimens were dissected bilaterally to study the C-OMW area afforded by the transcavernous exposure. Each specimen underwent full and limited transcavernous exposure and anterior clinoidectomy (1 procedure per side; 8 procedures). Limited exposure was defined as a dural elevation confined to the cavernous sinus. Full exposure included dural elevation over the gasserian ganglion, extending to the middle meningeal artery and lateral middle cranial fossa. RESULTS: The C-OMW area achieved with the limited transcavernous exposure, compared with full transcavernous exposure, provided significantly less total area with OMN mobilization (22 ± 6 mm2 vs 52 ± 26 mm2, P = .03) and a smaller relative increase in area after OMN mobilization (11 ± 5 mm2 vs 36 ± 13 mm2, P = .03). The increase after OMN mobilization in the C-OMW area after OMN mobilization was 136% ± 119% with a limited exposure vs 334% ± 216% with a full exposure. CONCLUSION: In this anatomical study, the full transcavernous exposure significantly improved OMN mobilization and C-OMW area compared with a limited transcavernous exposure. If a transcavernous exposure is pursued, the difference in the carotid-oculomotor operative corridor area achieved with a limited vs full exposure should be considered.

Novel System of Simulation Models for Aneurysm Clipping Training: Description of Models and Assessment of Face, Content, and Construct Validity.

BACKGROUND: Aneurysm clipping simulation models are needed to provide tactile feedback of biological vessels in a nonhazardous but surgically relevant environment. OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel system of simulation models for aneurysm clipping training and assess its validity. METHODS: Craniotomy models were fabricated to mimic actual tissues and movement restrictions experienced during actual surgery. Turkey wing vessels were used to create aneurysm models with patient-specific geometry. Three simulation models (middle cerebral artery aneurysm clipping via a pterional approach, anterior cerebral artery aneurysm clipping via an interhemispheric approach, and basilar artery aneurysm clipping via an orbitozygomatic pretemporal approach) were subjected to face, content, and construct validity assessments by experienced neurosurgeons (n = 8) and neurosurgery trainees (n = 8). RESULTS: Most participants scored the model as replicating actual aneurysm clipping well and scored the difficulty of clipping as being comparable to that of real surgery, confirming face validity. Most participants responded that the model could improve clip-applier-handling skills when working with patients, which confirms content validity. Experienced neurosurgeons performed significantly better than trainees on all 3 models based on subjective (P = .003) and objective (P < .01) ratings and on time to complete the task (P = .04), which confirms construct validity. Simulations were used to discuss clip application strategies and compare them to prototype clinical cases. CONCLUSION: This novel aneurysm clipping model can be used safely outside the wet laboratory; it has high face, content, and construct validity; and it can be an effective training tool for microneurosurgery training during aneurysm surgery courses.